Comparison Overview

FRench American Museum Exchange, Inc.

VS

The Pinhead Institute

FRench American Museum Exchange, Inc.

PO Box 5, Essex, 06426, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

The FRench American Museum Exchange (FRAME) promotes cultural exchange in the context of museum collaborations between North American and French institutions. It is a vibrant bilateral organization founded in 1999 by Elizabeth Rohatyn and Françoise Cachin, and remains the only organization of its kind. The FRAME network began with 18 museums and has nearly doubled in size in the past two decades. Plans are actively underway to further expand this network, and broaden and deepen its impact. FRAME fosters partnerships among its member museums to develop innovative exhibitions, educational and public programs, and professional exchanges among museum staff, and maintains a website to reach global audiences.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Pinhead Institute

300 S. Mahoney Drive, Telluride, Colorado, 81435, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Pinhead Institute is a Smithsonian Affiliate based in Telluride, Colorado, that strives to promote science-education both locally & globally. An international network of the world's leading scientists supports our many educational programs providing unparalleled opportunity to high-level scientific education in rural Colorado. Mission: Pinhead Institute educates and inspires children and adults in the greater Telluride region about the wonders of science and technology. How we do this: We do this through engaging programs, direct interaction with scientists, and unique research centered internship experiences. The Pinhead Institute, a 501(c)3 nonprofit organization, is a Smithsonian Affiliate, the first in Colorado.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/french-american-museum-exchange.jpeg
FRench American Museum Exchange, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-pinhead-institute.jpeg
The Pinhead Institute
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
FRench American Museum Exchange, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Pinhead Institute
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FRench American Museum Exchange, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Pinhead Institute in 2026.

Incident History — FRench American Museum Exchange, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FRench American Museum Exchange, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Pinhead Institute (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Pinhead Institute cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/french-american-museum-exchange.jpeg
FRench American Museum Exchange, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-pinhead-institute.jpeg
The Pinhead Institute
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Pinhead Institute company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to FRench American Museum Exchange, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Pinhead Institute company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to FRench American Museum Exchange, Inc. company.

In the current year, The Pinhead Institute company and FRench American Museum Exchange, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Pinhead Institute company nor FRench American Museum Exchange, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Pinhead Institute company nor FRench American Museum Exchange, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Pinhead Institute company nor FRench American Museum Exchange, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither FRench American Museum Exchange, Inc. company nor The Pinhead Institute company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither FRench American Museum Exchange, Inc. nor The Pinhead Institute holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither FRench American Museum Exchange, Inc. company nor The Pinhead Institute company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Pinhead Institute company employs more people globally than FRench American Museum Exchange, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither FRench American Museum Exchange, Inc. nor The Pinhead Institute holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither FRench American Museum Exchange, Inc. nor The Pinhead Institute holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither FRench American Museum Exchange, Inc. nor The Pinhead Institute holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither FRench American Museum Exchange, Inc. nor The Pinhead Institute holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither FRench American Museum Exchange, Inc. nor The Pinhead Institute holds HIPAA certification.

Neither FRench American Museum Exchange, Inc. nor The Pinhead Institute holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H