Comparison Overview

Family Research Council

VS

KIBU

Family Research Council

801 G St NW, Washington, District of Columbia, US, 20001
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Family Research Council's mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. To learn more about FRC, please visit our website at: www.frc.org. Find us also on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, YouTube, Rumble, and GETTR. To apply to any openings, please email your resume and cover letter to: [email protected]

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 111
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

KIBU

Ráday utca 30, Budapest, 1092, HU
Last Update: 2025-12-02

Kitchen Budapest an open innovation lab in Hungary. Kitchen Budapest was founded in 2007 by a collective of media artists, theoreticians and coders from miscellaneous backgrounds. As one of the first media labs in Hungary, KiBu found its primary mission to instigate digital literacy and DIY techniques on the local scene. Ever since, KiBu has been actively present as an internationally recognized innovation lab with young researchers and developers forming its team. KiBu incorporates three functions including research and development (prototyping, testing, service design, UX/UI design), education (next generation programs) and industry collaboration.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/frcdc.jpeg
Family Research Council
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kitchen-budapest.jpeg
KIBU
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Family Research Council
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
KIBU
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Family Research Council in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KIBU in 2025.

Incident History — Family Research Council (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Family Research Council cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — KIBU (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KIBU cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/frcdc.jpeg
Family Research Council
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kitchen-budapest.jpeg
KIBU
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

KIBU company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Family Research Council company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, KIBU company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Family Research Council company.

In the current year, KIBU company and Family Research Council company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither KIBU company nor Family Research Council company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither KIBU company nor Family Research Council company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither KIBU company nor Family Research Council company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Family Research Council company nor KIBU company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Family Research Council nor KIBU holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Family Research Council company nor KIBU company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Family Research Council company employs more people globally than KIBU company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither Family Research Council nor KIBU holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Family Research Council nor KIBU holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Family Research Council nor KIBU holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Family Research Council nor KIBU holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Family Research Council nor KIBU holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Family Research Council nor KIBU holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X