Comparison Overview

Family Research Council

VS

Center for Public Enterprise

Family Research Council

801 G St NW, Washington, District of Columbia, US, 20001
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Family Research Council's mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. To learn more about FRC, please visit our website at: www.frc.org. Find us also on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, YouTube, Rumble, and GETTR. To apply to any openings, please email your resume and cover letter to: [email protected]

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 111
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Center for Public Enterprise

Brooklyn, NY, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02

Center for Public Enterprise is an organization focused on broadening the public sector’s capacity to deliver economic development. We do so through our think tank by publishing original research and policy innovations, and by partnering directly with public agencies on designing and implementing development programs. Public enterprises serve Americans across many sectors of the economy—transit agencies, education districts, water systems, and airports are all examples—and with great benefit. Our goal is to grow the role for the public sector in the modern economy by helping to provide public institutions with the the tools to overcome economic constraints. CPE works with local, state and federal government agencies, as well as advocacy organizations, researchers, and academics to support successful design and implementation of public development programs.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/frcdc.jpeg
Family Research Council
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-for-public-enterprise.jpeg
Center for Public Enterprise
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Family Research Council
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Center for Public Enterprise
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Family Research Council in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Center for Public Enterprise in 2025.

Incident History — Family Research Council (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Family Research Council cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Center for Public Enterprise (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Center for Public Enterprise cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/frcdc.jpeg
Family Research Council
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-for-public-enterprise.jpeg
Center for Public Enterprise
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Family Research Council company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Center for Public Enterprise company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Center for Public Enterprise company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Family Research Council company.

In the current year, Center for Public Enterprise company and Family Research Council company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Center for Public Enterprise company nor Family Research Council company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Center for Public Enterprise company nor Family Research Council company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Center for Public Enterprise company nor Family Research Council company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Family Research Council company nor Center for Public Enterprise company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Family Research Council nor Center for Public Enterprise holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Family Research Council company nor Center for Public Enterprise company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Family Research Council company employs more people globally than Center for Public Enterprise company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither Family Research Council nor Center for Public Enterprise holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Family Research Council nor Center for Public Enterprise holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Family Research Council nor Center for Public Enterprise holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Family Research Council nor Center for Public Enterprise holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Family Research Council nor Center for Public Enterprise holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Family Research Council nor Center for Public Enterprise holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X