Comparison Overview

Family Research Council

VS

Arab Reform Initiative

Family Research Council

801 G St NW, Washington, District of Columbia, US, 20001
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Family Research Council's mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. To learn more about FRC, please visit our website at: www.frc.org. Find us also on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, YouTube, Rumble, and GETTR. To apply to any openings, please email your resume and cover letter to: [email protected]

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 111
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Arab Reform Initiative

Rue Taitbout, Paris, 75009, FR
Last Update: 2025-12-05
Between 750 and 799

The Arab Reform Initiative is the leading independent Arab think tank working with expert partners in the Middle East and North Africa and beyond to articulate a home-grown agenda for democratic change. It conducts research and policy analysis and provides a platform for inspirational voices based on the principles of diversity, impartiality, gender equality and social justice. - We produce original research informed by local experiences and partner with institutions to achieve impact across the Arab world and globally - We empower individuals and institutions to develop their own concept of policy solutions - We mobilize stakeholders to build coalitions for positive change Our aim is to see vibrant democratic societies emerge and grow in the region. Founded in 2005, the Arab Reform Initiative is governed by a Plenary of its members and an Executive Committee. To know more about us, visit our website: http://www.arab-reform.net/en Follow us on Twitter: @ArabReform_ARI Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/arab.reform.initiative Instagram: @arabreforminitiative

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 57
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/frcdc.jpeg
Family Research Council
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arab-reform-initiative.jpeg
Arab Reform Initiative
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Family Research Council
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Arab Reform Initiative
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Family Research Council in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Arab Reform Initiative in 2025.

Incident History — Family Research Council (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Family Research Council cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Arab Reform Initiative (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Arab Reform Initiative cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/frcdc.jpeg
Family Research Council
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arab-reform-initiative.jpeg
Arab Reform Initiative
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Family Research Council company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Arab Reform Initiative company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Arab Reform Initiative company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Family Research Council company.

In the current year, Arab Reform Initiative company and Family Research Council company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Arab Reform Initiative company nor Family Research Council company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Arab Reform Initiative company nor Family Research Council company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Arab Reform Initiative company nor Family Research Council company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Family Research Council company nor Arab Reform Initiative company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Family Research Council nor Arab Reform Initiative holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Family Research Council company nor Arab Reform Initiative company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Family Research Council company employs more people globally than Arab Reform Initiative company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither Family Research Council nor Arab Reform Initiative holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Family Research Council nor Arab Reform Initiative holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Family Research Council nor Arab Reform Initiative holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Family Research Council nor Arab Reform Initiative holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Family Research Council nor Arab Reform Initiative holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Family Research Council nor Arab Reform Initiative holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X