Comparison Overview

Fraunhofer USA CMI

VS

Tri-State Valve & Instrument

Fraunhofer USA CMI

Fraunhofer CMI @ Boston University, Brookline, Massachusetts, 02446, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26

The Fraunhofer CMI - Center for Manufacturing Innovation, located on the Boston University campus, conducts advanced research and development and engineers solutions for a broad range of industries including biotechnology, photonics, manufacturing and renewable energy. Engineers, scientists, faculty, and students at Fraunhofer CMI transform emerging research into viable technology solutions that meet the needs of both domestic and global clients. Our services include custom automation systems, biomedical instruments and devices, and process management and consulting. Part of Fraunhofer Gesellschaft, Europe’s largest R&D organization with 24,000 employees, CMI belongs to a strong international network of collaborative partners, including Boston University and the Fraunhofer Institute for Production Technology in Germany, facilitating technology transfer across the Atlantic. CMI also routinely collaborates with the top Boston area hospitals, including Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston Medical Center, Boston Children’s Hospital.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Tri-State Valve & Instrument

3497 Stanton Rd., Memphis, TN, 38108, US
Last Update: 2025-11-20
Between 750 and 799

Tri-State Valve & Instrument Co. is a specialty company offering valves, regulators, valve related accessories, valve automation and maintenance services to the chemical, refinery, pulp & paper, food processing and manufacturing industries. We proudly represent premier products throughout an eight state region. We proudly support our customers from 6 stocking locations: * Memphis, TN (VR) * El Dorado, AR (VR) * Calvert City, KY (VR) * Evansville, IN * Hamilton, MS * St. Louis, MO * Beaumont, TX

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 24
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fraunhofer-cmi.jpeg
Fraunhofer USA CMI
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tri-state-valve-&-instrument-co-.jpeg
Tri-State Valve & Instrument
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Fraunhofer USA CMI
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Tri-State Valve & Instrument
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fraunhofer USA CMI in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tri-State Valve & Instrument in 2025.

Incident History — Fraunhofer USA CMI (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fraunhofer USA CMI cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Tri-State Valve & Instrument (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tri-State Valve & Instrument cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fraunhofer-cmi.jpeg
Fraunhofer USA CMI
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tri-state-valve-&-instrument-co-.jpeg
Tri-State Valve & Instrument
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Fraunhofer USA CMI company and Tri-State Valve & Instrument company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Tri-State Valve & Instrument company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Fraunhofer USA CMI company.

In the current year, Tri-State Valve & Instrument company and Fraunhofer USA CMI company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Tri-State Valve & Instrument company nor Fraunhofer USA CMI company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Tri-State Valve & Instrument company nor Fraunhofer USA CMI company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Tri-State Valve & Instrument company nor Fraunhofer USA CMI company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Fraunhofer USA CMI company nor Tri-State Valve & Instrument company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Fraunhofer USA CMI nor Tri-State Valve & Instrument holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Fraunhofer USA CMI company nor Tri-State Valve & Instrument company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Fraunhofer USA CMI company employs more people globally than Tri-State Valve & Instrument company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither Fraunhofer USA CMI nor Tri-State Valve & Instrument holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Fraunhofer USA CMI nor Tri-State Valve & Instrument holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Fraunhofer USA CMI nor Tri-State Valve & Instrument holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Fraunhofer USA CMI nor Tri-State Valve & Instrument holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Fraunhofer USA CMI nor Tri-State Valve & Instrument holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Fraunhofer USA CMI nor Tri-State Valve & Instrument holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H