Comparison Overview

FRASER GEORGE AND ASSOCIATES LIMITED

VS

The Chicago Bar Foundation

FRASER GEORGE AND ASSOCIATES LIMITED

Newcastle House, Retford, Nottinghamshire, DN22 7UX, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

FRASER GEORGE AND ASSOCIATES LIMITED is a company based in Retford, Nottinghamshire. Fraser George and Associates Limited is a premier source of expert witness and forensic services for the legal and insurance professions, based in the North of England but serving national and international cases. Working at the heart of the company is Robert Brown a Chartered Electrical Engineer with over 42 year’s experience in the design and operation of electrical and electronic control systems for domestic and industrial environments including cable wiring, electrical current switching, electrical power generation and utilisation, automatic (computer) control of domestic and industrial process. Dr Brown is recognised as a world expert in the operation and design of electrical fuses, circuit breakers and other electrical fault protection systems. Dr Brown is a member of the Institute of Engineering Technology and is also a member of the Institute of Expert Witnesses. Notable Cases Dr R E Brown acted in… In the Woolwich Crown Court Regina -v- Seed Commentary on the attributes of electronic equipment alleged to have been fabricated by the defendant and used in the Chatilla Jewellery Store and Hatton Garden Safe Depository burglaries In the Newry Court House, Northern Ireland Motis (Ireland) Limited –v- Ministry of Justice Compensation dispute surrounding alleged damages caused by a bomb blast from an IRA car bomb in 2010. Company claiming £140,000 in commercial losses due to effects on computer system In the Supreme Court of Scotland Acotec UK Limited –v- McLaughlin & Harvey Limited Dispute concerning the submergence of a Cofferdam in water and the consequence of water ingress into electrical enclosures In the Central Criminal Court, Old Bailey, London Regina v Perkins Defense expert in the case involving fifteen (15) counts of exporting electronic goods outside of the EC Community without a export license and six (6) counts of fraud.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Chicago Bar Foundation

321 S. Plymouth Court, Chicago, 60604, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

As the charitable arm of the CBA, The Chicago Bar Foundation brings the legal community together to improve access to justice for people in need and make the legal system more fair and efficient for everyone. The CBF’s mission recognizes that taking a leadership role to ensure equal access to justice is our common cause as a profession, and that we can make a distinct impact in advancing that cause by the legal community coming together through the CBF. Thousands of individual lawyers and other dedicated individuals, more than 200 law firms and companies, and many other committed partners make the CBF’s work possible. Thanks to that strong leadership and support, the CBF millions in grants each year and continues to play a lead role in a number of innovative access to justice initiatives.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 24
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fraser-george-and-associates-limited.jpeg
FRASER GEORGE AND ASSOCIATES LIMITED
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-chicago-bar-foundation.jpeg
The Chicago Bar Foundation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
FRASER GEORGE AND ASSOCIATES LIMITED
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Chicago Bar Foundation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FRASER GEORGE AND ASSOCIATES LIMITED in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Chicago Bar Foundation in 2025.

Incident History — FRASER GEORGE AND ASSOCIATES LIMITED (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FRASER GEORGE AND ASSOCIATES LIMITED cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Chicago Bar Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Chicago Bar Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fraser-george-and-associates-limited.jpeg
FRASER GEORGE AND ASSOCIATES LIMITED
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-chicago-bar-foundation.jpeg
The Chicago Bar Foundation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

FRASER GEORGE AND ASSOCIATES LIMITED company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Chicago Bar Foundation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Chicago Bar Foundation company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to FRASER GEORGE AND ASSOCIATES LIMITED company.

In the current year, The Chicago Bar Foundation company and FRASER GEORGE AND ASSOCIATES LIMITED company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Chicago Bar Foundation company nor FRASER GEORGE AND ASSOCIATES LIMITED company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Chicago Bar Foundation company nor FRASER GEORGE AND ASSOCIATES LIMITED company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Chicago Bar Foundation company nor FRASER GEORGE AND ASSOCIATES LIMITED company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither FRASER GEORGE AND ASSOCIATES LIMITED company nor The Chicago Bar Foundation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither FRASER GEORGE AND ASSOCIATES LIMITED nor The Chicago Bar Foundation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither FRASER GEORGE AND ASSOCIATES LIMITED company nor The Chicago Bar Foundation company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Chicago Bar Foundation company employs more people globally than FRASER GEORGE AND ASSOCIATES LIMITED company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither FRASER GEORGE AND ASSOCIATES LIMITED nor The Chicago Bar Foundation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither FRASER GEORGE AND ASSOCIATES LIMITED nor The Chicago Bar Foundation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither FRASER GEORGE AND ASSOCIATES LIMITED nor The Chicago Bar Foundation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither FRASER GEORGE AND ASSOCIATES LIMITED nor The Chicago Bar Foundation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither FRASER GEORGE AND ASSOCIATES LIMITED nor The Chicago Bar Foundation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither FRASER GEORGE AND ASSOCIATES LIMITED nor The Chicago Bar Foundation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X