Comparison Overview

Frankston Packaging Company

VS

Alabama Graphics

Frankston Packaging Company

699 N. Frankston Hwy, Frankston, Texas, 75763, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.frankstonpackaging.com/index.html

You have just arrived at the Best-in-Class designer, manufacturer, and distributor of: High Quality Paperboard Folding Cartons Printed and Unprinted Custom Boxes Unprinted Stock Boxes Plastic Folding Cartons Printed and Unprinted Litho Laminated Corrugated Displays Rigid / Setup Boxes Printed and Unprinted Custom Boxes Stock Boxes / Calling Card Boxes Vinyl Boxes Plain and Hotstamped Can be matched up with a Rigid / Setup Base Overhead Transparency Converting and Fulfillment

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 75
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Alabama Graphics

2801 5th Avenue South, Birmingham, AL, 35233, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799
http://www.algraphics.com

As one of the state’s preferred digital printers and document management providers, Alabama Graphics strives to be your one-stop shop for all your printing, signage and document management needs. Equipped with the latest technology, our team is committed to providing customers with high-quality printing solutions as well as a loyal support network of seasoned professionals.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 43
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/frankston-packaging-company.jpeg
Frankston Packaging Company
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alabama-graphics.jpeg
Alabama Graphics
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Frankston Packaging Company
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Alabama Graphics
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Frankston Packaging Company in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Alabama Graphics in 2025.

Incident History — Frankston Packaging Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Frankston Packaging Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Alabama Graphics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Alabama Graphics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/frankston-packaging-company.jpeg
Frankston Packaging Company
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alabama-graphics.jpeg
Alabama Graphics
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Frankston Packaging Company company and Alabama Graphics company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Alabama Graphics company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Frankston Packaging Company company.

In the current year, Alabama Graphics company and Frankston Packaging Company company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Alabama Graphics company nor Frankston Packaging Company company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Alabama Graphics company nor Frankston Packaging Company company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Alabama Graphics company nor Frankston Packaging Company company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Frankston Packaging Company company nor Alabama Graphics company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Frankston Packaging Company nor Alabama Graphics holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Frankston Packaging Company company nor Alabama Graphics company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Frankston Packaging Company company employs more people globally than Alabama Graphics company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Frankston Packaging Company nor Alabama Graphics holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Frankston Packaging Company nor Alabama Graphics holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Frankston Packaging Company nor Alabama Graphics holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Frankston Packaging Company nor Alabama Graphics holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Frankston Packaging Company nor Alabama Graphics holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Frankston Packaging Company nor Alabama Graphics holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References