Comparison Overview

Franklin Law (New Zealand)

VS

Legal Services of Long Island

Franklin Law (New Zealand)

Level 2, Campbell Tyson Business Centre, Auckland, undefined, undefined, NZ
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

The legal environment is always changing, so the impact of the law and how it affects individuals and companies in our community is in a constant state of change also. At Franklin Law we're interested in this and how our legal teams can assist our clients to protect their assets and interests and navigate opportunities in a dynamic world. We do this by working to anticipate the needs and expectations of our clients and staying on top of legal developments and opportunities that might affect individuals and businesses we have contact with. Franklin Law's Personal Client team will assist you with any personal or estate planning you might wish to undertake, or assist you in relation to Elder Care matters. Our Property teams will take you through the process of buying or selling your residential or commercial property, leasing your commercial premise or subdividing your land; our Commercial team will work to help you stay ahead of the legal compliance game commercially and our in-house litigator will assist and represent you in court or during a mediation process. Offering legal expertise in: • Conveyancing • Residential Property • Commercial Property • Building Contracts • Subdivisions • Commercial Business Matters • Trust and Company Law • Employment Law • Dispute Resolution • Relationship Property • Asset Protection and Planning For more information and detail on our lawyers and legal staff visit www.franklinlaw.co.nz or call 0800 842 972. To read the latest news and views form our legal staff on legal matters that may be affecting you visit: http://franklinlaw.co.nz/up-to-date

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 37
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Legal Services of Long Island

1 Helen Keller Way 5th Fl, Hempstead, NY, 11550, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Legal Services of Long Island (LSLI), formerly known as Nassau Suffolk Law Services, is a leading non-profit organization dedicated to providing free legal services to the most vulnerable communities across Nassau and Suffolk counties. Since 1966, we have worked tirelessly to ensure free access to justice for individuals and families facing legal challenges but lacking the financial means to secure representation. Our mission is rooted in advocating for justice and defending the rights of low-income, disabled, and elderly residents, as well as survivors of domestic violence, veterans, and families in crisis. We believe that everyone, regardless of their income, deserves fair representation and the ability to live free from discrimination, unlawful eviction, and other injustices. Our areas of expertise include: Housing law: Defending tenants from eviction, foreclosure, and homelessness prevention. Disability advocacy: Helping individuals with disability rights claims and securing the services and benefits they are entitled to under the law. Family law: Assisting with custody disputes, orders of protection, child su We provide free legal services in thousands of cases each year as well as legal support to church, agency and grass roots organizations that work with the poor. NSLS is dedicated to providing equal access to basic human rights and services through provision of high quality legal representation, public information and community advocacy training to ensure that low income, disabled and disadvantaged individuals have equal access to the civil justice system on Long Island. The staff is comprised of attorneys, paralegals, social workers and support staff. The social work component is a unique feature of the program and is based on the recognition that some of our clients may need special support and services to manage and deal effectively with the legal system.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 121
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/franklin-law-new-zealand-.jpeg
Franklin Law (New Zealand)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Franklin Law (New Zealand)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Legal Services of Long Island
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Franklin Law (New Zealand) in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Legal Services of Long Island in 2025.

Incident History — Franklin Law (New Zealand) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Franklin Law (New Zealand) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Legal Services of Long Island (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Legal Services of Long Island cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/franklin-law-new-zealand-.jpeg
Franklin Law (New Zealand)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nassau-suffolk-law-services.jpeg
Legal Services of Long Island
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Franklin Law (New Zealand) company and Legal Services of Long Island company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Legal Services of Long Island company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Franklin Law (New Zealand) company.

In the current year, Legal Services of Long Island company and Franklin Law (New Zealand) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Legal Services of Long Island company nor Franklin Law (New Zealand) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Legal Services of Long Island company nor Franklin Law (New Zealand) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Legal Services of Long Island company nor Franklin Law (New Zealand) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Franklin Law (New Zealand) company nor Legal Services of Long Island company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Franklin Law (New Zealand) nor Legal Services of Long Island holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Legal Services of Long Island company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Franklin Law (New Zealand) company.

Legal Services of Long Island company employs more people globally than Franklin Law (New Zealand) company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Franklin Law (New Zealand) nor Legal Services of Long Island holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Franklin Law (New Zealand) nor Legal Services of Long Island holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Franklin Law (New Zealand) nor Legal Services of Long Island holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Franklin Law (New Zealand) nor Legal Services of Long Island holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Franklin Law (New Zealand) nor Legal Services of Long Island holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Franklin Law (New Zealand) nor Legal Services of Long Island holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X