Comparison Overview

Franklin County Bar Association (Pennsylvania)

VS

Rhode Island Bar Association

Franklin County Bar Association (Pennsylvania)

100 Lincoln Way East, Suite E, Chambersburg, 17201, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

We are dedicated to pursuing the administration of justice for all persons and upholding the integrity of our chosen profession. To accomplish our goals, we offer numerous programs for both our members and the community. In addition, we publish the Franklin County Legal Journal, the official legal publication of the county as designated by the Court of Common Pleas of the 39th Judicial District of Pennsylvania. And feel free to contact us if you need additional information about any of our programs.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Rhode Island Bar Association

41 Sharpe Drive, Cranston, Rhode Island 02920-4408, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

Rhode Island Bar Association is a unified bar association with over 6,000 attorney members licensed to practice in Rhode Island, and is located at 41 Sharpe Drive, Cranston, Rhode Island. The Rhode Island Bar Association's LinkedIn page assumes no responsibility for opinions, statements, and facts in posts, articles, or reviews, unless the subject matter merits attention. The views expressed in any post or content do not necessarily reflect the official stance of the Rhode Island Bar Association or its members.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Franklin County Bar Association (Pennsylvania)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ri-bar-association.jpeg
Rhode Island Bar Association
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Franklin County Bar Association (Pennsylvania)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Rhode Island Bar Association
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Franklin County Bar Association (Pennsylvania) in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rhode Island Bar Association in 2025.

Incident History — Franklin County Bar Association (Pennsylvania) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Franklin County Bar Association (Pennsylvania) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Rhode Island Bar Association (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rhode Island Bar Association cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Franklin County Bar Association (Pennsylvania)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ri-bar-association.jpeg
Rhode Island Bar Association
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Franklin County Bar Association (Pennsylvania) company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Rhode Island Bar Association company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Rhode Island Bar Association company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Franklin County Bar Association (Pennsylvania) company.

In the current year, Rhode Island Bar Association company and Franklin County Bar Association (Pennsylvania) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Rhode Island Bar Association company nor Franklin County Bar Association (Pennsylvania) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Rhode Island Bar Association company nor Franklin County Bar Association (Pennsylvania) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Rhode Island Bar Association company nor Franklin County Bar Association (Pennsylvania) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Franklin County Bar Association (Pennsylvania) company nor Rhode Island Bar Association company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Franklin County Bar Association (Pennsylvania) nor Rhode Island Bar Association holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Franklin County Bar Association (Pennsylvania) company nor Rhode Island Bar Association company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Rhode Island Bar Association company employs more people globally than Franklin County Bar Association (Pennsylvania) company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Franklin County Bar Association (Pennsylvania) nor Rhode Island Bar Association holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Franklin County Bar Association (Pennsylvania) nor Rhode Island Bar Association holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Franklin County Bar Association (Pennsylvania) nor Rhode Island Bar Association holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Franklin County Bar Association (Pennsylvania) nor Rhode Island Bar Association holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Franklin County Bar Association (Pennsylvania) nor Rhode Island Bar Association holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Franklin County Bar Association (Pennsylvania) nor Rhode Island Bar Association holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X