Comparison Overview

Law Office of Justin Frankel, P.C.

VS

Gray Becker, P.C.

Law Office of Justin Frankel, P.C.

1 Old Country Rd, Carle Place, New York, 11514, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

Law Office of Justin Frankel is a disability insurance law firm representing policyholders when private (individual) policies and ERISA policies (part of employee benefits package) have been denied or delayed. Law Office of Justin Frankel works with claimants before filing long term disability benefit claims, helping with the paperwork that can often be overwhelming, working with primary care and treating physicians, and avoiding the minefields set to trap unsuspecting people. We represent disability insurance claimants when long and short term disability benefit claims have been denied.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Gray Becker, P.C.

900 West Ave., Austin, Texas, 78701, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

For more than 30 years, Gray & Becker, P.C., has provided skillful representation for clients in complex legal matters. The firm has earned an acclaimed reputation, particularly for its accomplishments in litigation in diverse civil practice areas from business law to high-asset family law disputes. Our legal team consists of distinguished litigators, many of whom are recognized leaders in their fields. Building on the firm's cornerstones of excellence and experience, our legal practitioners boast a strong record of courtroom success. The firm's founders have tried hundreds of cases in state and federal court and have been selected for inclusion in Texas Super Lawyers. They are among the top business and family law litigators in Central Texas.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 32
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/frankel-&-newfield-p.c..jpeg
Law Office of Justin Frankel, P.C.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gray-&-becker-p-c-.jpeg
Gray Becker, P.C.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Law Office of Justin Frankel, P.C.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Gray Becker, P.C.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Law Office of Justin Frankel, P.C. in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gray Becker, P.C. in 2025.

Incident History — Law Office of Justin Frankel, P.C. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Law Office of Justin Frankel, P.C. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Gray Becker, P.C. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gray Becker, P.C. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/frankel-&-newfield-p.c..jpeg
Law Office of Justin Frankel, P.C.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gray-&-becker-p-c-.jpeg
Gray Becker, P.C.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Gray Becker, P.C. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Law Office of Justin Frankel, P.C. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Gray Becker, P.C. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Law Office of Justin Frankel, P.C. company.

In the current year, Gray Becker, P.C. company and Law Office of Justin Frankel, P.C. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Gray Becker, P.C. company nor Law Office of Justin Frankel, P.C. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Gray Becker, P.C. company nor Law Office of Justin Frankel, P.C. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Gray Becker, P.C. company nor Law Office of Justin Frankel, P.C. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Law Office of Justin Frankel, P.C. company nor Gray Becker, P.C. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Law Office of Justin Frankel, P.C. nor Gray Becker, P.C. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Law Office of Justin Frankel, P.C. company nor Gray Becker, P.C. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Gray Becker, P.C. company employs more people globally than Law Office of Justin Frankel, P.C. company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Law Office of Justin Frankel, P.C. nor Gray Becker, P.C. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Law Office of Justin Frankel, P.C. nor Gray Becker, P.C. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Law Office of Justin Frankel, P.C. nor Gray Becker, P.C. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Law Office of Justin Frankel, P.C. nor Gray Becker, P.C. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Law Office of Justin Frankel, P.C. nor Gray Becker, P.C. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Law Office of Justin Frankel, P.C. nor Gray Becker, P.C. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X