Comparison Overview

Franka

VS

The Systemcenter, Inc.

Franka

Studio 5, 1-7 Unwins Bridge Road, St Peters, NSW, AU, 2044
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Franka is the Australian home of high-quality, durable furniture - where timeless design meets the demands of everyday life. Franka is built on the principle of delivering beautifully proportioned, fuss-free furniture and home accessories that elevate your living space and withstand the test of time. Each piece has been hand-selected and designed for its beauty and timeless aesthetic, then rigorously road tested for its quality, durability and functionality ensuring each Franka item will endure for the long haul. Franka offers a tailored online shopping experience that showcases a growing collection of quality furniture and accessories, with more exciting additions on the way.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 27
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Systemcenter, Inc.

1738 SILVA ST, Honolulu, Hawaii, 96819, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

The Systemcenter, Inc. is a family-owned local business that has been furnishing solutions and spacesaving interiors since July 4, 1976 in Hawaii and the Pacific Rim. We have an experienced in-house team of qualified Market Managers and as well as certified installation/service technicians. The Systemcenter designs and installs Spacesaver compact storage systems and commercial furniture for the healthcare, education, government, business and museum markets. The Systemcenter’s showroom/office and warehouse in Kalihi is a net zero energy facility. We, along with our manufacturers, embrace best environmental practices and ideas of sustainable designs.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 49
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/franka-life.jpeg
Franka
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-systemcenter-inc-.jpeg
The Systemcenter, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Franka
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Systemcenter, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Franka in 2025.

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Systemcenter, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Franka (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Franka cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Systemcenter, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Systemcenter, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/franka-life.jpeg
Franka
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-systemcenter-inc-.jpeg
The Systemcenter, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Franka company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Systemcenter, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Systemcenter, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Franka company.

In the current year, The Systemcenter, Inc. company and Franka company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Systemcenter, Inc. company nor Franka company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Systemcenter, Inc. company nor Franka company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Systemcenter, Inc. company nor Franka company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Franka company nor The Systemcenter, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Franka nor The Systemcenter, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Franka company nor The Systemcenter, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Systemcenter, Inc. company employs more people globally than Franka company, reflecting its scale as a Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing.

Neither Franka nor The Systemcenter, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Franka nor The Systemcenter, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Franka nor The Systemcenter, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Franka nor The Systemcenter, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Franka nor The Systemcenter, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Franka nor The Systemcenter, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.