Comparison Overview

Franciscan Physician Network

VS

Medical University of South Carolina

Franciscan Physician Network

Franciscan Alliance -, Mishawaka, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10

BRING YOUR PASSION TO FRANCISCAN PHYSICIAN NETWORK The time is right; Franciscan Physician Network is recruiting dynamic professionals like you. It takes more than just knowledge to be a part of our team. It takes caring, commitment and a strong passion for what you do. We recognize our staff is our biggest asset and a critical component to ensuring exceptional patient care. Our success is achieved by recruiting dedicated professionals, like you, who are focused on providing quality health care as part of our patient-centered, faith-based mission. Join our exceptional team and discover a strong family atmosphere where you will feel valued and have the opportunity to collaborate with like-minded co-workers who are passionate about what they do. Franciscan Physician Network is a physician's network associated with Franciscan Alliance. Our network consists of health care centers covering four regions throughout the state of Indiana, South Suburban Chicago and South West Michigan.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 545
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Medical University of South Carolina

45 Courtenay Drive,, Charleston, sc, 29425, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

The Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) is a public institution of higher learning the purpose of which is to preserve and optimize human life in South Carolina and beyond. The university provides an interprofessional environment for learning and discovery through education of health care professionals and biomedical scientists, research in the health sciences and provision of comprehensive health care.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 14,577
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/franciscan-physician-network.jpeg
Franciscan Physician Network
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/medical-university-of-south-carolina.jpeg
Medical University of South Carolina
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Franciscan Physician Network
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Medical University of South Carolina
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Franciscan Physician Network in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Medical University of South Carolina in 2025.

Incident History — Franciscan Physician Network (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Franciscan Physician Network cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Medical University of South Carolina (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Medical University of South Carolina cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/franciscan-physician-network.jpeg
Franciscan Physician Network
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2010
Type:Data Leak
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/medical-university-of-south-carolina.jpeg
Medical University of South Carolina
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Medical University of South Carolina company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Franciscan Physician Network company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Franciscan Physician Network company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Medical University of South Carolina company has not reported any.

In the current year, Medical University of South Carolina company and Franciscan Physician Network company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Medical University of South Carolina company nor Franciscan Physician Network company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Medical University of South Carolina company nor Franciscan Physician Network company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Medical University of South Carolina company nor Franciscan Physician Network company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Franciscan Physician Network company nor Medical University of South Carolina company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Franciscan Physician Network nor Medical University of South Carolina holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Franciscan Physician Network company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Medical University of South Carolina company.

Medical University of South Carolina company employs more people globally than Franciscan Physician Network company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Franciscan Physician Network nor Medical University of South Carolina holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Franciscan Physician Network nor Medical University of South Carolina holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Franciscan Physician Network nor Medical University of South Carolina holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Franciscan Physician Network nor Medical University of South Carolina holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Franciscan Physician Network nor Medical University of South Carolina holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Franciscan Physician Network nor Medical University of South Carolina holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N