Comparison Overview

France Travail

VS

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

France Travail

1, avenue du docteur Gley, Paris, FR, 75020
Last Update: 2025-11-20

France Travail est un acteur majeur du marché de l’emploi en France où il s’investit pour faciliter le retour à l’emploi des demandeurs d’emploi et offrir aux entreprises des réponses adaptées à leurs besoins de recrutement. Les 55 000 collaborateurs de France Travail œuvrent au quotidien pour être le trait d’union entre les demandeurs d’emploi et les entreprises. France Travail is a key player in the French employment market. Its role is to help the unemployed find work and support companies to fulfil their recruitment requirements. Day-to-day, France Travail's 55,000 staff provides that vital link between job seekers and companies.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 30,500
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

1600 Clifton Rd., Atlanta, GA, US, 30333
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

CDC works 24/7 keeping America safe from health, safety and security threats, both foreign and domestic. Whether diseases start at home or abroad, are chronic or acute, curable or preventable, human error or deliberate attack, CDC fights it and supports communities and citizens to prevent it. CDC is the nation’s health protection agency - saving lives, protecting people from health threats, and saving money through prevention. For more information, please go to: http://www.cdc.gov/ Comment Policy: Please visit http://www.cdc.gov/SocialMedia/Tools/CommentPolicy.html to view CDC’s social media comment policy. Privacy Notice Regarding Third Party Websites: Privacy Notice: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention uses third-party Web sites to share information and to encourage collaboration with the public. Third-party Web sites are not Government-owned or Government-operated. They are controlled and operated by a third party not affiliated with CDC. The CDC Privacy Policy does not apply to third-party Web sites or applications. To learn more about CDC’s privacy practices, please visit our Privacy Policy at https://www.cdc.gov/other/privacy.html.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 20,033
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/francetravail.jpeg
France Travail
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/centers-for-disease-control-and-prevention.jpeg
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
France Travail
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

France Travail has 53.85% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in 2025.

Incident History — France Travail (X = Date, Y = Severity)

France Travail cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/francetravail.jpeg
France Travail
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Infostealer Malware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 3/2024
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: logiciels malveillants (infostealers), accès légitime via credentials volés
Motivation: vol de données, revente sur le dark web, phishing futur
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/centers-for-disease-control-and-prevention.jpeg
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Incidents

Date Detected: 01/2021
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Human Error
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to France Travail company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

France Travail company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention company.

In the current year, France Travail company has reported more cyber incidents than Centers for Disease Control and Prevention company.

Neither Centers for Disease Control and Prevention company nor France Travail company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both Centers for Disease Control and Prevention company and France Travail company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

France Travail company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Centers for Disease Control and Prevention company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither France Travail company nor Centers for Disease Control and Prevention company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither France Travail nor Centers for Disease Control and Prevention holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to France Travail company.

France Travail company employs more people globally than Centers for Disease Control and Prevention company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither France Travail nor Centers for Disease Control and Prevention holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither France Travail nor Centers for Disease Control and Prevention holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither France Travail nor Centers for Disease Control and Prevention holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither France Travail nor Centers for Disease Control and Prevention holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither France Travail nor Centers for Disease Control and Prevention holds HIPAA certification.

Neither France Travail nor Centers for Disease Control and Prevention holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H