Comparison Overview

Franca

VS

Neal & Harwell, PLC

Franca

378 Wellington St 12 Perth CBD, Western Australia 6000, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

Franca provides training on discrimination, harassment and bullying using adult learning principles that result in effective, powerful learning. Franca can tailor the training to meet your organisations needs and offers different levels of training to employees, managers/supervisors and grievance officers. Franca is also available to act as independent, objective investigators of complaints that occur within your workplace.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Neal & Harwell, PLC

1201 Demonbreun St, Nashville, Tennessee, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

For over fifty years, Neal & Harwell has been committed to providing the highest quality legal advice and representation for its clients. Neal & Harwell attorneys have demonstrated success in a broad range of practice areas including civil litigation, white-collar criminal defense, crisis management, banking, bankruptcy, family law, appellate matters, business and corporate law, complex plaintiff and catastrophic injury matters. The firm provides practical and business-focused solutions for its clients, and its attorneys use their knowledge and skills as advocates in courtrooms throughout the country. Neal & Harwell’s legal proficiency, high ethical standards and complex technical aptitude allow the firm to represent a myriad of individuals and companies nationally and internationally. For additional information, visit www.nealharwell.com.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 55
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/franca.jpeg
Franca
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/neal-&-harwell.jpeg
Neal & Harwell, PLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Franca
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Neal & Harwell, PLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Franca in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Neal & Harwell, PLC in 2025.

Incident History — Franca (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Franca cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Neal & Harwell, PLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Neal & Harwell, PLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/franca.jpeg
Franca
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/neal-&-harwell.jpeg
Neal & Harwell, PLC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Neal & Harwell, PLC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Franca company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Neal & Harwell, PLC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Franca company.

In the current year, Neal & Harwell, PLC company and Franca company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Neal & Harwell, PLC company nor Franca company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Neal & Harwell, PLC company nor Franca company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Neal & Harwell, PLC company nor Franca company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Franca company nor Neal & Harwell, PLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Franca nor Neal & Harwell, PLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Franca company nor Neal & Harwell, PLC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neal & Harwell, PLC company employs more people globally than Franca company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Franca nor Neal & Harwell, PLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Franca nor Neal & Harwell, PLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Franca nor Neal & Harwell, PLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Franca nor Neal & Harwell, PLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Franca nor Neal & Harwell, PLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Franca nor Neal & Harwell, PLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X