Comparison Overview

FPCR

VS

RNL

FPCR

Lockington Hall, Derby, Derbyshire, DE74 2RH, GB
Last Update: 2025-05-04 (UTC)
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.fpcr.co.uk

Leading integrated design and environmental practice working extensively in the UK and with projects worldwide. Since its formation in 1957 the practice has developed a valuable mix of multi-disciplinary expertise which enables us to respond to very complex projects in a creative yet thorough and co-ordinated manner. Our core skills combine masterplanning, environmental assessment, urban design, landscape, ecology, architecture, arboriculture and green infrastructure. We have implemented many award winning schemes in environmentally sensitive locations. FPCR believe in working closely with our clients as a team to achieve successful results meeting clients’ aspirations for innovative high quality solutions which are both viable and sustainable. A particularly valuable skill of the practice is our ability to balance commercial realities with expectations of planning authorities and statutory bodies. The practice comprises 8 directors supported by a talented and committed team of over 120 staff, operating from our offices at Lockington Hall near Derby, Exeter, Dorking and York.

NAICS: 54131
NAICS Definition: Architectural Services
Employees: 203
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

RNL

1050 17th Street Suite A200 Denver, CO 80265, US
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)
Between 750 and 799
http://www.stantec.com

RNL has joined Stantec, an architecture and engineering firm with more than 22,000 creative team members across six continents. Beginning March 19, we will be sharing all news and updates via Stantec's pages. We encourage you to follow www.linkedin.com/company/stantec/ for the latest on us and the rest of the Stantec team!

NAICS: 54131
NAICS Definition: Architectural Services
Employees: 10,001+
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fpcr.jpeg
FPCR
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rnl.jpeg
RNL
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
FPCR
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
RNL
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Architecture and Planning Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FPCR in 2025.

Incidents vs Architecture and Planning Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RNL in 2025.

Incident History — FPCR (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FPCR cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — RNL (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RNL cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fpcr.jpeg
FPCR
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rnl.jpeg
RNL
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

RNL company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to FPCR company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, RNL company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to FPCR company.

In the current year, RNL company and FPCR company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither RNL company nor FPCR company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither RNL company nor FPCR company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither RNL company nor FPCR company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither FPCR company nor RNL company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither FPCR nor RNL holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither FPCR company nor RNL company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

FPCR company employs more people globally than RNL company, reflecting its scale as a Architecture and Planning.

Neither FPCR nor RNL holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither FPCR nor RNL holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither FPCR nor RNL holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither FPCR nor RNL holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither FPCR nor RNL holds HIPAA certification.

Neither FPCR nor RNL holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

The Bold Page Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the ‘percentage’ parameter in all versions up to, and including, 5.4.5 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.

Published
Date
2025-10-23
Updated
Date
2025-10-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

The ComboServlet in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.111, and older unsupported versions, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.2, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.5, 7.4 GA through update 92, 7.3 GA through update 35, and older unsupported versions does not limit the number or size of the files it will combine, which allows remote attackers to create very large responses that lead to a denial of service attack via the URL query string.

Published
Date
2025-10-23
Updated
Date
2025-10-23
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A relative path traversal vulnerability was discovered in Productivity Suite software version 4.4.1.19. The vulnerability allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to interact with the ProductivityService PLC simulator and delete arbitrary directories on the target machine.

Published
Date
2025-10-23
Updated
Date
2025-10-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A relative path traversal vulnerability was discovered in Productivity Suite software version 4.4.1.19. The vulnerability allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to interact with the ProductivityService PLC simulator and create arbitrary directories on the target machine.

Published
Date
2025-10-23
Updated
Date
2025-10-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A relative path traversal vulnerability was discovered in Productivity Suite software version 4.4.1.19. The vulnerability allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to interact with the ProductivityService PLC simulator and delete arbitrary files on the target machine.

Published
Date
2025-10-23
Updated
Date
2025-10-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:H/SC:N/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References