Comparison Overview

Fozzy Group

VS

Apparel Group

Fozzy Group

13 Kalachevskaya Str. Kiev, 02090, UA
Last Update: 2026-01-18
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.fozzy.ua

Fozzy Group is one of the largest trade industrial groups in Ukraine and one of the leading Ukrainian retailers, with over 700 outlets all around the country. Besides retail, the group's businesses include food production, and restaurants. Fozzy Group is introducing modern solutions in all areas of its activity. By investing in improving its business processes, the group has achieved leading positions in the retail market. By performing retail chains logistics through its own distribution centers, Fozzy Group has been able to ensure the timely delivery of food to its stores all over Ukraine. In addition, the group operates its own quality control system, ensuring full compliance with its standards in goods storage, transportation and sale. Since its inception in 1997, Fozzy Group has focused on making innovative business improvements, creating new opportunities for the market and further developing the industry as a whole.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Apparel Group

JEBEL ALI SOUTH, Dubai, undefined, 261873, AE
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799
https://www.apparelgroup.com

Apparel Group is a multi-award-winning global fashion and lifestyle retail conglomerate based in Dubai, UAE, with operations across the GCC. Today, Apparel Group caters to millions of eager shoppers through its 2,300+ retail stores and 85+ brands on all platforms while employing over 24,000 multicultural staff. Apparel Group is set to cross new barriers and create fresh benchmarks in the retail industry to become the topmost global retailer. The company has achieved mercurial growth in the last 26 years by introducing world-class labels from around the globe, including Nine West, Tommy Hilfiger, ALDO, Charles & Keith, Jamie’s Italian and Tim Hortons, to name a few.

NAICS: 452
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13,471
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fozzy-group.jpeg
Fozzy Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/apparel-fzco.jpeg
Apparel Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Fozzy Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Apparel Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fozzy Group in 2026.

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Apparel Group in 2026.

Incident History — Fozzy Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fozzy Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Apparel Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Apparel Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fozzy-group.jpeg
Fozzy Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/apparel-fzco.jpeg
Apparel Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Apparel Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Fozzy Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Apparel Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Fozzy Group company.

In the current year, Apparel Group company and Fozzy Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Apparel Group company nor Fozzy Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Apparel Group company nor Fozzy Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Apparel Group company nor Fozzy Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Fozzy Group company nor Apparel Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Fozzy Group nor Apparel Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Apparel Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Fozzy Group company.

Apparel Group company employs more people globally than Fozzy Group company, reflecting its scale as a Retail.

Neither Fozzy Group nor Apparel Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Fozzy Group nor Apparel Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Fozzy Group nor Apparel Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Fozzy Group nor Apparel Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Fozzy Group nor Apparel Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Fozzy Group nor Apparel Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References