Comparison Overview

Foxtrot Custom

VS

The Artcraft Company

Foxtrot Custom

575 SW Old Highway 8, Suite 100, New Brighton, MN, US, 55112
Last Update: 2025-12-12
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://custom.foxtrotmarketing.com

What does a quick-on-their-feet online provider of custom t-shirts and apparel do when their current name doesn’t fully reflect their offerings? Rebrand, of course! We are more than excited to share that Coed Monkey is now Foxtrot Custom! Just like the dance that inspired our new name, we understand the importance of being in step with you for your custom t-shirt and apparel needs. Foxtrot Custom reflects our speedy precision, collaborative nature, and purposeful approach, ensuring your projects never miss a beat.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 0
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

The Artcraft Company

200 John L. Dietsch Blvd, North Attleboro, MA, 02763, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799
http://www.artcraft.com

Celebrating over 80 years, The Artcraft Company is recognized as a world-class leader in innovative and optimized print management, providing end-to-end, comprehensive printing and promotional product solutions to the leading financial, legal, consulting, manufacturing, retail, and design industries, large and small, across the globe. The most demanding firms have entrusted Artcraft to successfully execute print and promotional brand identity, wide-format printing, signage, corporate stationery programs, POD marketing collateral and campaigns, diverse specialty printing, inventory management, and custom integrated e-procurement solutions. Artcraft is proud of our ZERO CO2 Green initiative, reinforcing our company-wide commitment and pledge to reduce our environmental footprint through sustainable and socially responsible practices and procedures. Kindly tour us at artcraft.com

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 35
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/foxtrot-custom.jpeg
Foxtrot Custom
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-artcraft-company.jpeg
The Artcraft Company
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Foxtrot Custom
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Artcraft Company
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Foxtrot Custom in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Artcraft Company in 2025.

Incident History — Foxtrot Custom (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Foxtrot Custom cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Artcraft Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Artcraft Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/foxtrot-custom.jpeg
Foxtrot Custom
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-artcraft-company.jpeg
The Artcraft Company
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Foxtrot Custom company and The Artcraft Company company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, The Artcraft Company company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Foxtrot Custom company.

In the current year, The Artcraft Company company and Foxtrot Custom company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Artcraft Company company nor Foxtrot Custom company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Artcraft Company company nor Foxtrot Custom company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Artcraft Company company nor Foxtrot Custom company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Foxtrot Custom company nor The Artcraft Company company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Foxtrot Custom nor The Artcraft Company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Foxtrot Custom company nor The Artcraft Company company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Artcraft Company company employs more people globally than Foxtrot Custom company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Foxtrot Custom nor The Artcraft Company holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Foxtrot Custom nor The Artcraft Company holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Foxtrot Custom nor The Artcraft Company holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Foxtrot Custom nor The Artcraft Company holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Foxtrot Custom nor The Artcraft Company holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Foxtrot Custom nor The Artcraft Company holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References