Comparison Overview

FOX

VS

IMAGE SIGN

FOX

Chapman Way, Royal Tunbridge Wells, England, TN2 3EY, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-13
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.fox-ms.co.uk

Fox has been connecting businesses and customers, through high-end print and direct mail, since 2001. We work with the best brands in the travel, property, financial services, retail and charity sectors. Print, direct mail, exhibition stands, storage, distribution, bespoke corporate gifts… if it matters to you, it matters to us. And we’ll do whatever it takes to exceed your expectations – without it costing the earth. Fox: The print and direct mail experts.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

IMAGE SIGN

Unit 8b, Warne Road Business Centre, Weston-super-Mare, BS23 3UU, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-14
Between 750 and 799
http://www.image-sign.co.uk

IMAGE SIGN is your comprehensive solution for all signage needs, specialising in complete property development signage. Our expertise encompasses timber hoarding installation, printed site hoarding panels, and comprehensive site signage, extending to large-scale mesh building wraps. Beyond property development, we provide a full suite of Signage Marketing services, along with top-tier Vehicle Livery and Vehicle Wraps. At IMAGE SIGN, we are dedicated to creating, producing, and installing high-quality, impactful signage solutions tailored to elevate your brand and message.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/foxmsgroup.jpeg
FOX
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/imagesign.jpeg
IMAGE SIGN
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
FOX
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
IMAGE SIGN
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FOX in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IMAGE SIGN in 2025.

Incident History — FOX (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FOX cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — IMAGE SIGN (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IMAGE SIGN cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/foxmsgroup.jpeg
FOX
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/imagesign.jpeg
IMAGE SIGN
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

FOX company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to IMAGE SIGN company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, IMAGE SIGN company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to FOX company.

In the current year, IMAGE SIGN company and FOX company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither IMAGE SIGN company nor FOX company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither IMAGE SIGN company nor FOX company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither IMAGE SIGN company nor FOX company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither FOX company nor IMAGE SIGN company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither FOX nor IMAGE SIGN holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither FOX company nor IMAGE SIGN company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

FOX company employs more people globally than IMAGE SIGN company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither FOX nor IMAGE SIGN holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither FOX nor IMAGE SIGN holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither FOX nor IMAGE SIGN holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither FOX nor IMAGE SIGN holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither FOX nor IMAGE SIGN holds HIPAA certification.

Neither FOX nor IMAGE SIGN holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References