Comparison Overview

Fox Farley Willis & Burnette, PLLC.

VS

Gatton & Associates, P.C.

Fox Farley Willis & Burnette, PLLC.

310 North Main St, Clinton, Tn, 37716, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Tennessee Personal Injury and Wrongful Death Attorneys At Fox Farley Willis & Burnette, PLLC, we focus on personal injury and wrongful death cases. Our team provides aggressive, results-driven representation on a contingency fee basis—meaning you don’t pay unless we win your case and secure a settlement or verdict that meets your approval. With over 60 years of combined experience and a skilled team of legal professionals, we proudly serve clients throughout East Tennessee and beyond. Whether you or a loved one has been injured by a negligent driver, a careless property owner, we understand the physical, emotional, and financial toll these incidents take. Our compassionate attorneys are committed to fighting for the compensation you deserve to help cover medical costs, lost wages, pain, and suffering—so you can focus on healing and moving forward. We also specialize in representing out-of-state clients who are injured while visiting Tennessee. Whether it’s a tourist exploring the Smoky Mountains or a traveler passing through, we are experienced in navigating the complexities of multi-state legal claims. We welcome referrals from out-of-state law firms and offer a trusted partnership to ensure your clients receive the dedicated representation they need while handling the logistical and jurisdictional challenges these cases can bring.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Gatton & Associates, P.C.

10400 Academy Blvd. NE, Ste. 350, Albuquerque, NM, 87111, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

At Gatton & Associates, P.C., we have developed an excellent reputation with both referral sources and clients during our 20-year history. We are known for our high-quality work in all practice areas, resulting in both partners’ and attorneys’ achievement of excellent ratings among their peers. Client feedback consistently praises our attorneys for their experience, their knowledge and the creative solutions they bring to the resolution of their sometimes difficult problems. Clients also express gratitude for their attorneys’ timely response to their needs and the personable and compassionate way they approach their concerns and issues.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fox-and-farley-attorneys-at-law.jpeg
Fox Farley Willis & Burnette, PLLC.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/law-office-of-george-dave-giddens-p-c-.jpeg
Gatton & Associates, P.C.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Fox Farley Willis & Burnette, PLLC.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Gatton & Associates, P.C.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fox Farley Willis & Burnette, PLLC. in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gatton & Associates, P.C. in 2025.

Incident History — Fox Farley Willis & Burnette, PLLC. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fox Farley Willis & Burnette, PLLC. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Gatton & Associates, P.C. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gatton & Associates, P.C. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fox-and-farley-attorneys-at-law.jpeg
Fox Farley Willis & Burnette, PLLC.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/law-office-of-george-dave-giddens-p-c-.jpeg
Gatton & Associates, P.C.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Fox Farley Willis & Burnette, PLLC. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Gatton & Associates, P.C. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Gatton & Associates, P.C. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Fox Farley Willis & Burnette, PLLC. company.

In the current year, Gatton & Associates, P.C. company and Fox Farley Willis & Burnette, PLLC. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Gatton & Associates, P.C. company nor Fox Farley Willis & Burnette, PLLC. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Gatton & Associates, P.C. company nor Fox Farley Willis & Burnette, PLLC. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Gatton & Associates, P.C. company nor Fox Farley Willis & Burnette, PLLC. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Fox Farley Willis & Burnette, PLLC. company nor Gatton & Associates, P.C. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Fox Farley Willis & Burnette, PLLC. nor Gatton & Associates, P.C. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Fox Farley Willis & Burnette, PLLC. company nor Gatton & Associates, P.C. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Fox Farley Willis & Burnette, PLLC. company employs more people globally than Gatton & Associates, P.C. company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Fox Farley Willis & Burnette, PLLC. nor Gatton & Associates, P.C. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Fox Farley Willis & Burnette, PLLC. nor Gatton & Associates, P.C. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Fox Farley Willis & Burnette, PLLC. nor Gatton & Associates, P.C. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Fox Farley Willis & Burnette, PLLC. nor Gatton & Associates, P.C. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Fox Farley Willis & Burnette, PLLC. nor Gatton & Associates, P.C. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Fox Farley Willis & Burnette, PLLC. nor Gatton & Associates, P.C. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X