Comparison Overview

Fox Farley Willis & Burnette, PLLC.

VS

ATTORNEYS-IN-A-RUSH.COM

Fox Farley Willis & Burnette, PLLC.

310 North Main St, Clinton, Tn, 37716, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Tennessee Personal Injury and Wrongful Death Attorneys At Fox Farley Willis & Burnette, PLLC, we focus on personal injury and wrongful death cases. Our team provides aggressive, results-driven representation on a contingency fee basis—meaning you don’t pay unless we win your case and secure a settlement or verdict that meets your approval. With over 60 years of combined experience and a skilled team of legal professionals, we proudly serve clients throughout East Tennessee and beyond. Whether you or a loved one has been injured by a negligent driver, a careless property owner, we understand the physical, emotional, and financial toll these incidents take. Our compassionate attorneys are committed to fighting for the compensation you deserve to help cover medical costs, lost wages, pain, and suffering—so you can focus on healing and moving forward. We also specialize in representing out-of-state clients who are injured while visiting Tennessee. Whether it’s a tourist exploring the Smoky Mountains or a traveler passing through, we are experienced in navigating the complexities of multi-state legal claims. We welcome referrals from out-of-state law firms and offer a trusted partnership to ensure your clients receive the dedicated representation they need while handling the logistical and jurisdictional challenges these cases can bring.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

ATTORNEYS-IN-A-RUSH.COM

1500 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19102, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

ATTORNEYS-IN-A-RUSH.COM has one primary goal in mind – to grant potential users of legal services quick access to attorneys in their geographic area. Attorneys who subscribe to our service agree to respond promptly to any user who initiates a contact via the ATTORNEYS-IN-A-RUSH.COM apps or website. Users should reasonably expect to receive a return phone call from an attorney or a legal representative typically within 8 business hours of the initial contact. ATTORNEYS-IN-A-RUSH.COM does not guarantee or warrant the legal services provided by the attorneys who subscribe to its services. All users who utilize the services of ATTORNEYS-IN-A-RUSH.COM will have the opportunity to provide general feedback on the responsiveness and quality of service of the attorneys they contact. • ATTORNEYS-IN-A-RUSH.COM prides itself on providing its Users quick access to qualified attorneys within the specified jurisdictions and with specific search criteria (including language). • ATTORNEYS-IN-A-RUSH.COM utilizes a vast array of social media and other advertising tools to generate brand awareness among Users. • ATTORNEYS-IN-A-RUSH.COM attorney subscription costs are a fraction of what larger legal subscription services, including ‘LAWYERS.COM’, charges for similar services.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fox-and-farley-attorneys-at-law.jpeg
Fox Farley Willis & Burnette, PLLC.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/attorneys-in-a-rush.com.jpeg
ATTORNEYS-IN-A-RUSH.COM
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Fox Farley Willis & Burnette, PLLC.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ATTORNEYS-IN-A-RUSH.COM
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fox Farley Willis & Burnette, PLLC. in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ATTORNEYS-IN-A-RUSH.COM in 2025.

Incident History — Fox Farley Willis & Burnette, PLLC. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fox Farley Willis & Burnette, PLLC. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ATTORNEYS-IN-A-RUSH.COM (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ATTORNEYS-IN-A-RUSH.COM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fox-and-farley-attorneys-at-law.jpeg
Fox Farley Willis & Burnette, PLLC.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/attorneys-in-a-rush.com.jpeg
ATTORNEYS-IN-A-RUSH.COM
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Fox Farley Willis & Burnette, PLLC. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ATTORNEYS-IN-A-RUSH.COM company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, ATTORNEYS-IN-A-RUSH.COM company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Fox Farley Willis & Burnette, PLLC. company.

In the current year, ATTORNEYS-IN-A-RUSH.COM company and Fox Farley Willis & Burnette, PLLC. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ATTORNEYS-IN-A-RUSH.COM company nor Fox Farley Willis & Burnette, PLLC. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither ATTORNEYS-IN-A-RUSH.COM company nor Fox Farley Willis & Burnette, PLLC. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither ATTORNEYS-IN-A-RUSH.COM company nor Fox Farley Willis & Burnette, PLLC. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Fox Farley Willis & Burnette, PLLC. company nor ATTORNEYS-IN-A-RUSH.COM company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Fox Farley Willis & Burnette, PLLC. nor ATTORNEYS-IN-A-RUSH.COM holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Fox Farley Willis & Burnette, PLLC. company nor ATTORNEYS-IN-A-RUSH.COM company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Fox Farley Willis & Burnette, PLLC. company employs more people globally than ATTORNEYS-IN-A-RUSH.COM company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Fox Farley Willis & Burnette, PLLC. nor ATTORNEYS-IN-A-RUSH.COM holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Fox Farley Willis & Burnette, PLLC. nor ATTORNEYS-IN-A-RUSH.COM holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Fox Farley Willis & Burnette, PLLC. nor ATTORNEYS-IN-A-RUSH.COM holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Fox Farley Willis & Burnette, PLLC. nor ATTORNEYS-IN-A-RUSH.COM holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Fox Farley Willis & Burnette, PLLC. nor ATTORNEYS-IN-A-RUSH.COM holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Fox Farley Willis & Burnette, PLLC. nor ATTORNEYS-IN-A-RUSH.COM holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X