Comparison Overview

Fox & Frank Enterprises

VS

MIT Office of Resource Development

Fox & Frank Enterprises

90606, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.FoxandFrank.com

We do fund-raising for all types of organizations, agencies and businesses with particular emphasis on non-profit groups. We are pleased to share our best practices which have won national acclaim for thorough, precise grant applications which lead to award of funds for your projects 100% of the time. We have a money-back guarantee of satisfaction and all awarded contracts have always had complete audit acceptance at the end of the completed project. No corporation in the field has a greater award and audit approval than Fox & Frank Enterprises. We would like to get your project moving forward with the needed funding today. The current Federal, State, and private fund-raising climate has never been better! There are BILLIONS of dollars waiting to be awarded from private foundations for the worthy social and educational projects.

NAICS: 561499
NAICS Definition: All Other Business Support Services
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

MIT Office of Resource Development

600 Memorial Drive, Cambridge, MA, 02139, US
Last Update: 2025-12-21
Between 750 and 799
http://development.mit.edu/

At MIT, we pursue education, research, and innovation with a passion for serious impact. As we look to the horizon, we see a future of important challenges and inspiring opportunities, and we are committed to building a better world. MIT's Office of Resource Development serves MIT’s mission by strategically fostering lifelong relationships with alumni, friends, and organizations that result in goodwill and philanthropic engagement. The Institute’s Resource Development staff works closely with the MIT Alumni Association staff and network of reunion and fundraising volunteers to generate private support for a broad range of purposes, including building construction and renovation, undergraduate scholarships and graduate fellowships, professorships, research, athletics, and the arts, among others. To learn more about Resource Development's twelve teams, visit https://development.mit.edu/who-we-are/ We are a part of MIT's energizing and inclusive community, rich with intellectual and cultural stimulation and an entrepreneurial spirit that fosters limitless opportunities for personal and professional growth.

NAICS: 561499
NAICS Definition: All Other Business Support Services
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Fox & Frank Enterprises
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mit-office-of-resource-development.jpeg
MIT Office of Resource Development
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Fox & Frank Enterprises
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
MIT Office of Resource Development
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fox & Frank Enterprises in 2025.

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MIT Office of Resource Development in 2025.

Incident History — Fox & Frank Enterprises (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fox & Frank Enterprises cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — MIT Office of Resource Development (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MIT Office of Resource Development cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Fox & Frank Enterprises
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mit-office-of-resource-development.jpeg
MIT Office of Resource Development
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Fox & Frank Enterprises company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to MIT Office of Resource Development company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, MIT Office of Resource Development company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Fox & Frank Enterprises company.

In the current year, MIT Office of Resource Development company and Fox & Frank Enterprises company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither MIT Office of Resource Development company nor Fox & Frank Enterprises company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither MIT Office of Resource Development company nor Fox & Frank Enterprises company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither MIT Office of Resource Development company nor Fox & Frank Enterprises company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Fox & Frank Enterprises company nor MIT Office of Resource Development company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Fox & Frank Enterprises nor MIT Office of Resource Development holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

MIT Office of Resource Development company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Fox & Frank Enterprises company.

MIT Office of Resource Development company employs more people globally than Fox & Frank Enterprises company, reflecting its scale as a Fundraising.

Neither Fox & Frank Enterprises nor MIT Office of Resource Development holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Fox & Frank Enterprises nor MIT Office of Resource Development holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Fox & Frank Enterprises nor MIT Office of Resource Development holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Fox & Frank Enterprises nor MIT Office of Resource Development holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Fox & Frank Enterprises nor MIT Office of Resource Development holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Fox & Frank Enterprises nor MIT Office of Resource Development holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
References
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
References
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References