Comparison Overview

FOURTEEN

VS

MacMillan Trade Marks

FOURTEEN

14 Gray's Inn Square, London, England, WC1R 5JP, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Fourteen is a leading specialist family law set with a national reputation for excellence. With dedicated practice teams in children law, family finance, the Court of Protection and international family law, our barristers provide specialist representation and advice. We also have a team of trained mediators who work with private individuals and local authorities in a range of family law disputes. A number of our former colleagues are senior members of the judiciary and several current members combine their practises at the Bar with part-time judicial positions. We are a dynamic and forward-thinking set of Chambers and offer an approach that is both specialist and personalised. We have occupied a prominent position in the legal marketplace for many years and have consistently been recognised for our excellence by the legal directories. Specialities Family law, private law children, public law children, family finance, matrimonial finance, civil partnerships, cohabitation, Schedule 1 of the Children Act, TOLATA, Inheritance Act, financial remedied, divorce, Court of Protection, mental capacity, judicial review, community care, public access, mediation, alternative dispute resolution

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 51
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

MacMillan Trade Marks

AU
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Macmillan Trade Marks is now a part of in-house style essential professional services firm, Source. We are a team of experienced, commercially-minded professionals with a mission to deliver exceptional professional services in a unique way to suit your needs. By combining our forces under one roof, our team offers a full scale legal, governance, risk and compliance department to your business. With Source, our offer is simple – tailored, exceptional support by our entire team, whenever and however you need it. When you work with Source, you’ll gain the power of a fully-fledged in-house style team that works the way you do.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fourteen.jpeg
FOURTEEN
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/macmillan-trademarks.jpeg
MacMillan Trade Marks
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
FOURTEEN
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
MacMillan Trade Marks
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FOURTEEN in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MacMillan Trade Marks in 2025.

Incident History — FOURTEEN (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FOURTEEN cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — MacMillan Trade Marks (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MacMillan Trade Marks cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fourteen.jpeg
FOURTEEN
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/macmillan-trademarks.jpeg
MacMillan Trade Marks
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

MacMillan Trade Marks company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to FOURTEEN company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, MacMillan Trade Marks company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to FOURTEEN company.

In the current year, MacMillan Trade Marks company and FOURTEEN company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither MacMillan Trade Marks company nor FOURTEEN company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither MacMillan Trade Marks company nor FOURTEEN company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither MacMillan Trade Marks company nor FOURTEEN company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither FOURTEEN company nor MacMillan Trade Marks company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither FOURTEEN nor MacMillan Trade Marks holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

MacMillan Trade Marks company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to FOURTEEN company.

Neither FOURTEEN nor MacMillan Trade Marks holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither FOURTEEN nor MacMillan Trade Marks holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither FOURTEEN nor MacMillan Trade Marks holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither FOURTEEN nor MacMillan Trade Marks holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither FOURTEEN nor MacMillan Trade Marks holds HIPAA certification.

Neither FOURTEEN nor MacMillan Trade Marks holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X