Comparison Overview

Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts

VS

Shangri-La Group

Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts

1165 Leslie Street, Toronto, M3C 2K8, CA
Last Update: 2026-01-20
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.fourseasons.com

Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts opened its first hotel in 1961, and since that time has been dedicated to perfecting the travel experience through continual innovation and the highest standards of hospitality. Currently operating more than 130 hotels and resorts, and more than 55 residential properties in major city centers and resort destinations in 47 countries, and with more than 50 projects under planning or development, Four Seasons consistently ranks among the world's best hotels and most prestigious brands in reader polls, traveler reviews and industry awards. To learn more about our career opportunities, visit fourseasons.com/careers. For more information and reservations, visit fourseasons.com. For the latest news, visit press.fourseasons.com.

NAICS: 7211
NAICS Definition: Traveler Accommodation
Employees: 41,187
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Shangri-La Group

Kerry Centre, 683 King's Road, Quarry Bay, Hong Kong, HK
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 700 and 749
http://www.shangri-la.com/group/

Headquartered in Hong Kong SAR, the Shangri-La Group has grown from a single hotel business to a diverse and integrated global portfolio comprising quality real estate and investment properties, wellness and lifestyle facilities. Today, the Group owns, operates and manages 100+ hotels under our family of five brands: Shangri-La, Shangri-La Signatures, Kerry Hotels, JEN by Shangri-La, and Traders. We are part of the Kuok Group, one of Asia's most dynamic multinational conglomerates and a leader in properties, logistics, agribusiness, maritime and hospitality. From our strong base in Asia, we have expanded into key gateway cities and markets around the world. Our properties sit on some of the world’s most prestigious addresses and exotic destinations. Through the environments we have created, we enable people to come together to live, work, play, eat, and rest well.

NAICS: 7211
NAICS Definition: Traveler Accommodation
Employees: 16,362
Subsidiaries: 10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/four-seasons-hotels-and-resorts.jpeg
Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/shangri-la-hotels-and-resorts.jpeg
Shangri-La Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Shangri-La Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts in 2026.

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Shangri-La Group in 2026.

Incident History — Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Shangri-La Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Shangri-La Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/four-seasons-hotels-and-resorts.jpeg
Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2016
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/shangri-la-hotels-and-resorts.jpeg
Shangri-La Group
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2022
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Shangri-La Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts and Shangri-La Group have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, Shangri-La Group company and Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Shangri-La Group company nor Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both Shangri-La Group company and Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Neither Shangri-La Group company nor Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts company nor Shangri-La Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts nor Shangri-La Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Shangri-La Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts company.

Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts company employs more people globally than Shangri-La Group company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitality.

Neither Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts nor Shangri-La Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts nor Shangri-La Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts nor Shangri-La Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts nor Shangri-La Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts nor Shangri-La Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts nor Shangri-La Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References