Comparison Overview

Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts

VS

Mandarin Oriental

Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts

1165 Leslie Street, Toronto, M3C 2K8, CA
Last Update: 2026-01-20
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.fourseasons.com

Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts opened its first hotel in 1961, and since that time has been dedicated to perfecting the travel experience through continual innovation and the highest standards of hospitality. Currently operating more than 130 hotels and resorts, and more than 55 residential properties in major city centers and resort destinations in 47 countries, and with more than 50 projects under planning or development, Four Seasons consistently ranks among the world's best hotels and most prestigious brands in reader polls, traveler reviews and industry awards. To learn more about our career opportunities, visit fourseasons.com/careers. For more information and reservations, visit fourseasons.com. For the latest news, visit press.fourseasons.com.

NAICS: 7211
NAICS Definition: Traveler Accommodation
Employees: 41,187
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Mandarin Oriental

18 Westlands Road, Quarry Bay, ., HK
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799
http://www.mandarinoriental.com

Mandarin Oriental Hotel Group is the award-winning owner and operator of some of the world’s most luxurious hotels, resorts and residences. Having grown from its Asian roots into a global brand, the Group now operates 43 hotels, 12 residences and 23 exclusive homes in 26 countries and territories, with each property reflecting the Group’s oriental heritage, local culture and unique design. Mandarin Oriental has a strong pipeline of hotels and residences under development and is a member of the Jardine Matheson Group. Mandarin Oriental’s aim is to be recognised widely as the best global luxury hotel group, providing 21st-century luxury with oriental charm in each of its hotels. This will be achieved by investing in the Group’s exceptional facilities and people while maximizing profitability and long-term shareholder value. The Group regularly receives recognition and awards for outstanding service and quality management. The strategy of the Group is to open the hotels currently under development while continuing to seek further selective opportunities for expansion around the world. The parent company, Mandarin Oriental International Limited, is incorporated in Bermuda and has a premium listing on the London Stock Exchange, with secondary listings in Bermuda and Singapore. Mandarin Oriental Hotel Group International Limited, which operates from Hong Kong, manages the activities of the Group’s hotels. Mandarin Oriental is a member of the Jardine Matheson Group.

NAICS: 7211
NAICS Definition: Traveler Accommodation
Employees: 13,845
Subsidiaries: 11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/four-seasons-hotels-and-resorts.jpeg
Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mandarin-oriental-hotel-group.jpeg
Mandarin Oriental
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Mandarin Oriental
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts in 2026.

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mandarin Oriental in 2026.

Incident History — Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Mandarin Oriental (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mandarin Oriental cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/four-seasons-hotels-and-resorts.jpeg
Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2016
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mandarin-oriental-hotel-group.jpeg
Mandarin Oriental
Incidents

Date Detected: 01/2021
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2014
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Malware
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Mandarin Oriental company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Mandarin Oriental company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts company.

In the current year, Mandarin Oriental company and Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Mandarin Oriental company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Mandarin Oriental company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Mandarin Oriental company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts company nor Mandarin Oriental company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts nor Mandarin Oriental holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Mandarin Oriental company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts company.

Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts company employs more people globally than Mandarin Oriental company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitality.

Neither Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts nor Mandarin Oriental holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts nor Mandarin Oriental holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts nor Mandarin Oriental holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts nor Mandarin Oriental holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts nor Mandarin Oriental holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts nor Mandarin Oriental holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References