Comparison Overview

Four Mile Historic Park

VS

Textile Museum of Canada

Four Mile Historic Park

715 S. FOREST ST, DENVER, Colorado, 80246, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

On the banks of Cherry Creek, just four miles from downtown Denver, Four Mile Historic Park is a 12-acre oasis featuring Denver's oldest standing structure, pioneer exhibits, special events for all ages, and guided tours that transport visitors to Colorado's frontier past. Once a wayside inn and stage stop, Four Mile House and grounds are the setting for unique family, student, senior and rental activities that offer visitors a unique experience apart from the bustle of their busy lives.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Textile Museum of Canada

55 Centre Avenue, Toronto, M5G 2H5, CA
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

The Textile Museum of Canada aims to inspire understanding of the human experience through textiles. It is the only museum in Canada delivering programs and exhibitions dedicated solely to textile arts. The Museum ignites creativity, inspires wonder, and sparks conversation through the stories held within its global collection of textiles and active engagement with contemporary art practices. For more information, visit: textilemuseum.ca, @textilemuseumofcanada, and #TextileMuseumOfCanada, on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 32
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/four-mile-historic-park.jpeg
Four Mile Historic Park
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/textile-museum-of-canada.jpeg
Textile Museum of Canada
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Four Mile Historic Park
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Textile Museum of Canada
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Four Mile Historic Park in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Textile Museum of Canada in 2025.

Incident History — Four Mile Historic Park (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Four Mile Historic Park cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Textile Museum of Canada (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Textile Museum of Canada cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/four-mile-historic-park.jpeg
Four Mile Historic Park
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/textile-museum-of-canada.jpeg
Textile Museum of Canada
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Four Mile Historic Park company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Textile Museum of Canada company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Textile Museum of Canada company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Four Mile Historic Park company.

In the current year, Textile Museum of Canada company and Four Mile Historic Park company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Textile Museum of Canada company nor Four Mile Historic Park company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Textile Museum of Canada company nor Four Mile Historic Park company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Textile Museum of Canada company nor Four Mile Historic Park company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Four Mile Historic Park company nor Textile Museum of Canada company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Four Mile Historic Park nor Textile Museum of Canada holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Four Mile Historic Park company nor Textile Museum of Canada company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Textile Museum of Canada company employs more people globally than Four Mile Historic Park company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Four Mile Historic Park nor Textile Museum of Canada holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Four Mile Historic Park nor Textile Museum of Canada holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Four Mile Historic Park nor Textile Museum of Canada holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Four Mile Historic Park nor Textile Museum of Canada holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Four Mile Historic Park nor Textile Museum of Canada holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Four Mile Historic Park nor Textile Museum of Canada holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X