Comparison Overview

Fountain Hills Theater

VS

Pittsburgh CLO

Fountain Hills Theater

None
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.fhtaz.org

Established in 1987 Once an organization that began with two or three productions per year held in an elementary school cafeteria, Fountain Hills Theater (FHT) has become a major player in the Arizona art scene. We are proud to say that we now produce over a dozen productions annually, divided between two full time stages, and have received numerous awards for creative excellence. Our popular programs focus on the adults and youth of our community. Our thriving theater sponsors several after school performing arts education programs, summer camps, special events, adult theater trips to New York City and London, outreach productions, scholarship opportunities, volunteer support groups and a motivated and professional office staff.

NAICS: 711
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Pittsburgh CLO

719 Liberty Ave, Pittsburgh, PA, US, 15222
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799
http://pittsburghclo.org

Since 1946, Pittsburgh CLO has been the driving force behind live musical theater in Pittsburgh and the entire Southwestern Pennsylvania region. Under the direction of Van Kaplan since 1997, this not-for-profit arts organization appreciates the support of nearly 200,000 patrons yearly who attend its performances at three venues in the Cultural District: a seasonal subscription series at the Benedum Center, A Musical Christmas Carol at the Byham Theater and year-round shows at the CLO Cabaret. Its dedication to the musical theater art form includes educational programs such as the CLO Academy for Performance and Art, the CLO Mini Stars, the Gene Kelly Awards, the Richard Rodgers Award and The National High School Theatre Awards. As part of its new works development, the organization has been involved with 22 Broadway shows (30 Tony Awards®), and in 2014 produced the world premiere of An American in Paris, on Broadway (4 Tony Awards®) and in London’s West End. For more information please visit pittsburghCLO.org

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 90
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fountain-hills-theater.jpeg
Fountain Hills Theater
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pittsburgh-clo.jpeg
Pittsburgh CLO
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Fountain Hills Theater
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Pittsburgh CLO
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fountain Hills Theater in 2025.

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pittsburgh CLO in 2025.

Incident History — Fountain Hills Theater (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fountain Hills Theater cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Pittsburgh CLO (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pittsburgh CLO cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fountain-hills-theater.jpeg
Fountain Hills Theater
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pittsburgh-clo.jpeg
Pittsburgh CLO
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Fountain Hills Theater company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Pittsburgh CLO company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Pittsburgh CLO company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Fountain Hills Theater company.

In the current year, Pittsburgh CLO company and Fountain Hills Theater company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Pittsburgh CLO company nor Fountain Hills Theater company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Pittsburgh CLO company nor Fountain Hills Theater company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Pittsburgh CLO company nor Fountain Hills Theater company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Fountain Hills Theater company nor Pittsburgh CLO company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Fountain Hills Theater nor Pittsburgh CLO holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Fountain Hills Theater company nor Pittsburgh CLO company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Pittsburgh CLO company employs more people globally than Fountain Hills Theater company, reflecting its scale as a Performing Arts.

Neither Fountain Hills Theater nor Pittsburgh CLO holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Fountain Hills Theater nor Pittsburgh CLO holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Fountain Hills Theater nor Pittsburgh CLO holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Fountain Hills Theater nor Pittsburgh CLO holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Fountain Hills Theater nor Pittsburgh CLO holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Fountain Hills Theater nor Pittsburgh CLO holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References