Comparison Overview

Foundlings Press

VS

IngramSpark

Foundlings Press

14 Fairfield Ave, Buffalo, New York, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26

Foundlings Press is an independent literary publisher with offices in Buffalo, NY and Los Angeles, CA. Its core mission is to publish the best poets currently writing in English; but the press also produces select titles of exceptional nonfiction, journalism, memoir, literary criticism, visual material, lyrics, and hybrid prose and verse works that defy categorization. Foundlings Press includes the imprint The Public Books, operated jointly with The Public, Western New York’s alternative weekly newspaper, which launched in 2014 to present the smartest thinking on the whole spectrum of Western New York culture, from politics to film, from books to visual arts, from music to food and drink and more. The Public Books operates as the publishing arm of The Public, presenting full-length titles by frequent Public authors and associates.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

IngramSpark

14 Ingram Blvd, La Vergne, Tennessee, 37086, US
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

IngramSpark is the only publishing platform that delivers fully integrated print, digital, wholesale, and distribution services to the book industry through a single source. What does that mean? Once you finish and format your book we make it possible to share it with the world. A relationship with IngramSpark allows you to focus on your specialty—creating innovative content while we manage the dull stuff: printing, shipping and distribution.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 94
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/foundlings-press.jpeg
Foundlings Press
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ingramspark.jpeg
IngramSpark
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Foundlings Press
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
IngramSpark
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Foundlings Press in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IngramSpark in 2025.

Incident History — Foundlings Press (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Foundlings Press cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — IngramSpark (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IngramSpark cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/foundlings-press.jpeg
Foundlings Press
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ingramspark.jpeg
IngramSpark
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Foundlings Press company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to IngramSpark company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, IngramSpark company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Foundlings Press company.

In the current year, IngramSpark company and Foundlings Press company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither IngramSpark company nor Foundlings Press company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither IngramSpark company nor Foundlings Press company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither IngramSpark company nor Foundlings Press company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Foundlings Press company nor IngramSpark company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Foundlings Press nor IngramSpark holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Foundlings Press company nor IngramSpark company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

IngramSpark company employs more people globally than Foundlings Press company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Foundlings Press nor IngramSpark holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Foundlings Press nor IngramSpark holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Foundlings Press nor IngramSpark holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Foundlings Press nor IngramSpark holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Foundlings Press nor IngramSpark holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Foundlings Press nor IngramSpark holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.