Comparison Overview

Founders Form

VS

Stephens

Founders Form

Palo Alto, 94306, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Founders Form, PC is a bold, forward-thinking partner for ambitious startups, athletes, entertainers, and investors. We craft legal strategies that empower you to shape every venture on your own terms. From guiding nine figure fundraises to securing transformative brand deals, our team has proven its ability to navigate high-stakes challenges while staying true to each client’s vision. We believe in building genuine partnerships grounded in authenticity, respect, and a shared commitment to driving real world success. At Founders Form, you’re more than a client—you’re the architect of your future, and we’re here to help you realize it.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Stephens

11/12 Pall Mall, London, undefined, SW1Y 5YU, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

Stephens was founded in London in 1983. Since that time we have focused on the provision of legal and business advice to our clients in relation to the international growth of their companies. We operate mainly within the sports and fashion sectors, covering such areas as international strategy, distribution, licensing, marketing, litigation management and IP management. We act for brand owners as well as local distributors, licensees and agents. Our desire is to focus on a small number of successful businesses and by doing so be able to more effectively understand and cater to each of their needs.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 56
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/founders-form-pc.jpeg
Founders Form
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stephens-&-associates.jpeg
Stephens
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Founders Form
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Stephens
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Founders Form in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stephens in 2025.

Incident History — Founders Form (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Founders Form cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Stephens (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stephens cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/founders-form-pc.jpeg
Founders Form
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stephens-&-associates.jpeg
Stephens
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Founders Form company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Stephens company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Stephens company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Founders Form company.

In the current year, Stephens company and Founders Form company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Stephens company nor Founders Form company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Stephens company nor Founders Form company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Stephens company nor Founders Form company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Founders Form company nor Stephens company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Founders Form nor Stephens holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Founders Form company nor Stephens company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Stephens company employs more people globally than Founders Form company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Founders Form nor Stephens holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Founders Form nor Stephens holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Founders Form nor Stephens holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Founders Form nor Stephens holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Founders Form nor Stephens holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Founders Form nor Stephens holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X