Comparison Overview

Foundations Health

VS

NC Society for Clinical Social Work

Foundations Health

None
Last Update: 2026-01-23

Foundations Health fosters a culture of healing and community to help with your process of health and wellness throughout substance use disorders, mental health issues and opioid dependence. Foundations Health is proud to be a member of Foundations Recovery Network. Physicians are on the medical staff of Foundations Health, but, with limited exceptions, are independent practitioners who are not employees or agents of Foundations Health. The facility shall not be liable for actions or treatments provided by physicians. Model representations of real patients are shown. We are unable to provide medical advice through social media. Please contact your physician, or in case of emergency, call 911 or the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline at 988. Please visit our website for language assistance, disability accommodations, the non-discrimination notice, Terms of Service and other important disclaimers.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

NC Society for Clinical Social Work

None
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

A professional organization specifically for clinical social workers which promotes high standards of professional education, ethical practice and achievement.  It is our goal to increase the expertise of the clinical social worker by providing education through workshops, presentations and courses.  We also desire to protect the mental health consumer and maintain quality service through active maintenance of the NC licensure and vendorship laws and to promote consumer choice in selecting mental health professionals.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/foundations-health-high-point.jpeg
Foundations Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Foundations Health
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
NC Society for Clinical Social Work
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Foundations Health in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NC Society for Clinical Social Work in 2026.

Incident History — Foundations Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Foundations Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — NC Society for Clinical Social Work (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NC Society for Clinical Social Work cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/foundations-health-high-point.jpeg
Foundations Health
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nc-society-for-clinical-social-work.jpeg
NC Society for Clinical Social Work
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

NC Society for Clinical Social Work company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Foundations Health company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, NC Society for Clinical Social Work company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Foundations Health company.

In the current year, NC Society for Clinical Social Work company and Foundations Health company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither NC Society for Clinical Social Work company nor Foundations Health company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither NC Society for Clinical Social Work company nor Foundations Health company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither NC Society for Clinical Social Work company nor Foundations Health company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Foundations Health company nor NC Society for Clinical Social Work company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Foundations Health nor NC Society for Clinical Social Work holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Foundations Health company nor NC Society for Clinical Social Work company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither Foundations Health nor NC Society for Clinical Social Work holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Foundations Health nor NC Society for Clinical Social Work holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Foundations Health nor NC Society for Clinical Social Work holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Foundations Health nor NC Society for Clinical Social Work holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Foundations Health nor NC Society for Clinical Social Work holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Foundations Health nor NC Society for Clinical Social Work holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.