Comparison Overview

Foundations Counseling, LLC

VS

The Nord Center

Foundations Counseling, LLC

400 E Horsetooth Rd, Fort Collins, Colorado, 80525, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23

Foundations Counseling provides caring, expert guidance in a warm and inviting environment built around personal respect and dignity. Our experienced therapists offer you a broad range of high-quality mental health and relationship counseling with an extraordinary level of service. At Foundations Counseling our mission is to provide hope and healing to individuals, couples, families, children, and adolescents who are experiencing emotional, relational, and marital distress. It is our privilege to offer you a broad range of high-quality mental health and relationship counseling with an extraordinary level of service. Here you will find a warm, caring, and confidential environment where you may explore the topics that are keeping you from living the life you want.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 47
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Nord Center

6140 S Broadway, Lorain, 44053, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

The Nord Center is a private, non-profit agency providing comprehensive behavioral and mental health services to children, adolescents and adults in the greater Lorain County area. Our services include outpatient counseling; sexual assault / rape crisis services; drug and alcohol addiction; dual diagnosis (substance abuse and mental illness); psychiatry and medication management; employment and vocational services; supportive housing as well as homelessness prevention. We also offer culturally-specific services to bilingual and African-American consumers. Our Mission: Engaging people in our community to achieve mental and emotional health through prevention, treatment, and advocacy.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 155
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/foundations-counseling-llc.jpeg
Foundations Counseling, LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-nord-center.jpeg
The Nord Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Foundations Counseling, LLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Nord Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Foundations Counseling, LLC in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Nord Center in 2026.

Incident History — Foundations Counseling, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Foundations Counseling, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Nord Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Nord Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/foundations-counseling-llc.jpeg
Foundations Counseling, LLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-nord-center.jpeg
The Nord Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Nord Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Foundations Counseling, LLC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Nord Center company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Foundations Counseling, LLC company.

In the current year, The Nord Center company and Foundations Counseling, LLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Nord Center company nor Foundations Counseling, LLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Nord Center company nor Foundations Counseling, LLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Nord Center company nor Foundations Counseling, LLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Foundations Counseling, LLC company nor The Nord Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Foundations Counseling, LLC nor The Nord Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Foundations Counseling, LLC company nor The Nord Center company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Nord Center company employs more people globally than Foundations Counseling, LLC company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Foundations Counseling, LLC nor The Nord Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Foundations Counseling, LLC nor The Nord Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Foundations Counseling, LLC nor The Nord Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Foundations Counseling, LLC nor The Nord Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Foundations Counseling, LLC nor The Nord Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Foundations Counseling, LLC nor The Nord Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N