Comparison Overview

Foundation for the WA Museum

VS

McLean County Museum of History

Foundation for the WA Museum

140 William St, Perth, Western Australia, 6000, AU
Last Update: 2026-01-16
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.fwam.com.au

The best structures are built on strong foundations. The Foundation for the WA Museum believes that museums should spark a love of learning in the next generation. They should nurture a fascination with the past, an understanding of the present, and a passion for the future – and inspire us all in unexpected ways. Importantly, they should influence and motivate young people to investigate the areas of science, technology, the arts and mathematics in the world around them. The Foundation for the WA Museum is an independent organisation that has been committed to securing the future of our state heritage since 1995.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

McLean County Museum of History

200 N Main St, Bloomington, Illinois, 61701
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
http://www.mchistory.org

The McLean County Museum of History traces its roots back to 1892, the year the McLean County Historical Society was founded. It is a nationally accredited award winning museum with five permanent exhibit galleries and two rotating galleries. This educational institution is dedicated to telling the rich story of McLean County through programs which serve people of all ages. The museum features seven exhibit galleries, preserves more than 20,000 objects, makes available more than 15,000 rare and hard-to-find books on local history and genealogy, and manages 2,000 feet of historical papers and images in its archives.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 34
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mclean-county-museum-of-history.jpeg
McLean County Museum of History
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Foundation for the WA Museum
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
McLean County Museum of History
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Foundation for the WA Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for McLean County Museum of History in 2026.

Incident History — Foundation for the WA Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Foundation for the WA Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — McLean County Museum of History (X = Date, Y = Severity)

McLean County Museum of History cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/foundation-for-the-wa-museum.jpeg
Foundation for the WA Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mclean-county-museum-of-history.jpeg
McLean County Museum of History
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

McLean County Museum of History company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Foundation for the WA Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, McLean County Museum of History company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Foundation for the WA Museum company.

In the current year, McLean County Museum of History company and Foundation for the WA Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither McLean County Museum of History company nor Foundation for the WA Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither McLean County Museum of History company nor Foundation for the WA Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither McLean County Museum of History company nor Foundation for the WA Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Foundation for the WA Museum company nor McLean County Museum of History company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Foundation for the WA Museum nor McLean County Museum of History holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Foundation for the WA Museum company nor McLean County Museum of History company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

McLean County Museum of History company employs more people globally than Foundation for the WA Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Foundation for the WA Museum nor McLean County Museum of History holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Foundation for the WA Museum nor McLean County Museum of History holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Foundation for the WA Museum nor McLean County Museum of History holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Foundation for the WA Museum nor McLean County Museum of History holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Foundation for the WA Museum nor McLean County Museum of History holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Foundation for the WA Museum nor McLean County Museum of History holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References