Comparison Overview

Foundation for the WA Museum

VS

Maxville Heritage Interpretive Center

Foundation for the WA Museum

140 William St, Perth, Western Australia, 6000, AU
Last Update: 2026-01-16
Between 750 and 799

The best structures are built on strong foundations. The Foundation for the WA Museum believes that museums should spark a love of learning in the next generation. They should nurture a fascination with the past, an understanding of the present, and a passion for the future – and inspire us all in unexpected ways. Importantly, they should influence and motivate young people to investigate the areas of science, technology, the arts and mathematics in the world around them. The Foundation for the WA Museum is an independent organisation that has been committed to securing the future of our state heritage since 1995.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Maxville Heritage Interpretive Center

US
Last Update: 2026-01-23

Our mission is to gather, preserve, and share the rich history of African American, Indigenous, and immigrant loggers in the Pacific Northwest. We utilize inclusive stories of multicultural logging communities to better connect the experiences of immigrants and migrants to a larger American narrative.” Founded in 2008, the Maxville Heritage Interpretive Center (MHIC) tells the forgotten histories of African American loggers in the Pacific Northwest. We are dedicated to educating the public about the history and significance of Maxville founded in 1923 as a railroad logging town and similar towns in the Pacific Northwest. Our goal is to share Oregon’s multiethnic logging history and to provide access to educational materials of these important histories to our region. We offer programs to our local community, host events celebrating logging history, staff a visitor center, collaborate on artistic projects, and present a traveling exhibit. MHIC museum is in Joseph, Oregon, an arts and cultural hub of eastern Oregon located in the beautiful Wallowa Mountains. Wallowa County covers 3,152 square miles in remote NE Oregon, with 7,008 residents. The local economy, ranching and timber, is bolstered by heritage and arts tourism, which includes MHIC. Since April 2013, MHIC has been based in Joseph, one of the first Arts and Culture Districts in Oregon at the foothills of the Wallowa Mountains and Moraine, one of the "Seven Wonders of Oregon.” Joseph is a national and international tourist destination, and MHIC is in the heart of Downtown Joseph. At this location, MHIC welcomes visitors, volunteers, and donations to learn about the Maxville story through exhibitions and programs. We serve our local and regional community, including school-aged children in Eastern and South Eastern Oregon, Maxville descendants, and people of color in our community who do not see their histories represented in the existing education, interpretive centers, and museums in our region.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/maxville-heritage-interpretive-center.jpeg
Maxville Heritage Interpretive Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Foundation for the WA Museum
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Maxville Heritage Interpretive Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Foundation for the WA Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Maxville Heritage Interpretive Center in 2026.

Incident History — Foundation for the WA Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Foundation for the WA Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Maxville Heritage Interpretive Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Maxville Heritage Interpretive Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/foundation-for-the-wa-museum.jpeg
Foundation for the WA Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/maxville-heritage-interpretive-center.jpeg
Maxville Heritage Interpretive Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Maxville Heritage Interpretive Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Foundation for the WA Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Maxville Heritage Interpretive Center company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Foundation for the WA Museum company.

In the current year, Maxville Heritage Interpretive Center company and Foundation for the WA Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Maxville Heritage Interpretive Center company nor Foundation for the WA Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Maxville Heritage Interpretive Center company nor Foundation for the WA Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Maxville Heritage Interpretive Center company nor Foundation for the WA Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Foundation for the WA Museum company nor Maxville Heritage Interpretive Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Foundation for the WA Museum nor Maxville Heritage Interpretive Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Foundation for the WA Museum company nor Maxville Heritage Interpretive Center company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Foundation for the WA Museum company employs more people globally than Maxville Heritage Interpretive Center company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Foundation for the WA Museum nor Maxville Heritage Interpretive Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Foundation for the WA Museum nor Maxville Heritage Interpretive Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Foundation for the WA Museum nor Maxville Heritage Interpretive Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Foundation for the WA Museum nor Maxville Heritage Interpretive Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Foundation for the WA Museum nor Maxville Heritage Interpretive Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Foundation for the WA Museum nor Maxville Heritage Interpretive Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H