Comparison Overview

Fotografiska

VS

American Museum of Natural History

Fotografiska

Stadsgårdshamnen 22, None, Stockholm, None, SE, 116 45
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

We are the Contemporary Museum of Photography, Art & Culture. A destination to discover world-class photography, inspiring programming, elevated dining and surprising new perspectives. Aiming to create a more conscious world through the power of photography, arts & culture, Fotografiska produces dynamic and unparalleled rotating exhibitions, spanning various genres in inclusive environments. With a dedicated international community and locations in Stockholm, Berlin, Shanghai and Tallinn, we are the premier global gathering place for photography, art and culture.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 343
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

American Museum of Natural History

Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, NY, US, 10024
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

The American Museum of Natural History is one of the world's preeminent scientific and cultural institutions. Since its founding in 1869, the Museum has advanced its global mission to discover, interpret and disseminate information about human cultures, the natural world and the universe through a wide-ranging program of scientific research, education and exhibition. The Museum is renowned for its exhibitions and scientific collections, which serve as a field guide to the entire planet and present a panorama of the world's cultures.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 1,522
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fotografiska-international.jpeg
Fotografiska
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/american-museum-of-natural-history.jpeg
American Museum of Natural History
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Fotografiska
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
American Museum of Natural History
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fotografiska in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for American Museum of Natural History in 2025.

Incident History — Fotografiska (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fotografiska cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — American Museum of Natural History (X = Date, Y = Severity)

American Museum of Natural History cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fotografiska-international.jpeg
Fotografiska
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/american-museum-of-natural-history.jpeg
American Museum of Natural History
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

American Museum of Natural History company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Fotografiska company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, American Museum of Natural History company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Fotografiska company.

In the current year, American Museum of Natural History company and Fotografiska company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither American Museum of Natural History company nor Fotografiska company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither American Museum of Natural History company nor Fotografiska company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither American Museum of Natural History company nor Fotografiska company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Fotografiska company nor American Museum of Natural History company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Fotografiska nor American Museum of Natural History holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

American Museum of Natural History company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Fotografiska company.

American Museum of Natural History company employs more people globally than Fotografiska company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Fotografiska nor American Museum of Natural History holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Fotografiska nor American Museum of Natural History holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Fotografiska nor American Museum of Natural History holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Fotografiska nor American Museum of Natural History holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Fotografiska nor American Museum of Natural History holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Fotografiska nor American Museum of Natural History holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X