Comparison Overview

FOTODOK

VS

Lorenzo Photography

FOTODOK

Lange Nieuwstraat 7, Utrecht, 3512 PA, NL
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 700 and 749

FOTODOK intends to demonstrate the importance of visual stories and stands for the potential of photographers and visual artists to drive change. Reflection on urgent social issues is at the heart of FOTODOK’s work. FOTODOK shows different perspectives on the world and provides tools to make informed social choices for the future by learning to look, observe and interpret images.

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Lorenzo Photography

None
Last Update: 2025-12-14

Photography came by chance into my life; and now it’s a job, but remains my greatest passion. I love letting the things happen by themselves and simply capturing what happens, this allow me to create something personal and unique for you with my camera. I am discreet and sensitive, creative and precise. I love watching people. I love to meet new people and see faraway places. I love long car trips. I love the soft and warm light of sunsets. My style is modern, fresh and exciting. I live the photograph in a simple way without preconceptions.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fotodok.jpeg
FOTODOK
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lorenzo-photography.jpeg
Lorenzo Photography
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
FOTODOK
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lorenzo Photography
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FOTODOK in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lorenzo Photography in 2025.

Incident History — FOTODOK (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FOTODOK cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lorenzo Photography (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lorenzo Photography cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fotodok.jpeg
FOTODOK
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lorenzo-photography.jpeg
Lorenzo Photography
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Lorenzo Photography company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to FOTODOK company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Lorenzo Photography company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to FOTODOK company.

In the current year, Lorenzo Photography company and FOTODOK company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Lorenzo Photography company nor FOTODOK company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Lorenzo Photography company nor FOTODOK company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Lorenzo Photography company nor FOTODOK company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither FOTODOK company nor Lorenzo Photography company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither FOTODOK nor Lorenzo Photography holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither FOTODOK company nor Lorenzo Photography company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

FOTODOK company employs more people globally than Lorenzo Photography company, reflecting its scale as a Photography.

Neither FOTODOK nor Lorenzo Photography holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither FOTODOK nor Lorenzo Photography holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither FOTODOK nor Lorenzo Photography holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither FOTODOK nor Lorenzo Photography holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither FOTODOK nor Lorenzo Photography holds HIPAA certification.

Neither FOTODOK nor Lorenzo Photography holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N