Comparison Overview

Foster Law Offices

VS

PacerPro

Foster Law Offices

5055 Buttermilk Hollow Road, West Mifflin, PA, 15122, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Foster Law Offices is a firm that is dedicated to providing superior bankruptcy law services. Our personalized, bankruptcy law services include: Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Small Business Reorganization Bankruptcy Recommendations Mortgage Repayment Credit Card Elimination/Negotiation Medical Bill Elimination/Negotiation Wage Garnishment Elimination We can also assist you with restructuring your vehicle loans, student loans, Federal and State income tax debt; as well as providing a solution to most real estate debt problems. Foster Law Offices is proud to serve as the Bankruptcy Lawyer of choice for several individuals in Erie, Crawford, Mercer and Venango Counties. We look forward to the opportunity to serving you, and hope to add you to our long list of satisfied clients who received Bankruptcy Legal Services from Foster Law Offices. We invite you to contact us with any questions you may have regarding utility shut-offs, foreclosures, harassing phone calls, bankruptcy or to schedule a free consultation.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

PacerPro

undefined, San Francisco, CA, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

PacerPro helps legal teams derive insight from public information. Our workflow automation service delivers federal court filings in real-time to case teams to enable informed, timely decisions about case strategy. Our experience capture system delivers the entirety of any individual firm's federal court records, including filings and meta data, to the correct client matter workspace on firm document management platforms. These tools eliminate costly manual work and empowers firms to unlock the full value of their collective experience. Next up: fueled by a $5 million raise, we have brought on a veteran engineering leader and are rapidly expanding into state courts.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 29
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/foster-law-offices.jpeg
Foster Law Offices
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pacerpro.jpeg
PacerPro
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Foster Law Offices
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
PacerPro
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Foster Law Offices in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PacerPro in 2025.

Incident History — Foster Law Offices (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Foster Law Offices cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — PacerPro (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PacerPro cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/foster-law-offices.jpeg
Foster Law Offices
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pacerpro.jpeg
PacerPro
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Foster Law Offices company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to PacerPro company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, PacerPro company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Foster Law Offices company.

In the current year, PacerPro company and Foster Law Offices company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither PacerPro company nor Foster Law Offices company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither PacerPro company nor Foster Law Offices company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither PacerPro company nor Foster Law Offices company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Foster Law Offices company nor PacerPro company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Foster Law Offices nor PacerPro holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Foster Law Offices company nor PacerPro company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

PacerPro company employs more people globally than Foster Law Offices company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Foster Law Offices nor PacerPro holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Foster Law Offices nor PacerPro holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Foster Law Offices nor PacerPro holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Foster Law Offices nor PacerPro holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Foster Law Offices nor PacerPro holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Foster Law Offices nor PacerPro holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X