Comparison Overview

Foss Waterway Seaport

VS

Tudor Place Historic House & Garden

Foss Waterway Seaport

undefined, undefined, undefined, 98421, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.fosswaterwayseaport.org

Foss Waterway Seaport is dedicated to celebrating Tacoma's rich maritime heritage — past, present, and future. The development partners of this project — the Foss Waterway Seaport and the Foss Waterway Development Authority — are creating a venue bringing downtown Tacoma's gathering place to life and providing waterfront public access for the rich teaching platform provided by Commencement Bay and Puget Sound. When fully completed, the Seaport will be the most comprehensive maritime heritage and education center on the US west coast and the only authentic Pacific Northwest facility to showcase the region's maritime history in a location where that history actually took place!

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 26
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Tudor Place Historic House & Garden

1644 31st St NW, None, Washington, District of Columbia, US, 20007
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
https://www.tudorplace.org

A model of Federal-period architecture in the nation’s capital, Tudor Place was home to six generations of Martha Washington’s descendants and the enslaved workers and servants who lived and worked here. With thousands of decorative objects, including the largest Washington Collection outside of Mount Vernon, Tudor Place sits on 5 ½ acres in the heart of Georgetown.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 31
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/foss-waterway-seaport.jpeg
Foss Waterway Seaport
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tudor-place-historic-house-and-garden.jpeg
Tudor Place Historic House & Garden
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Foss Waterway Seaport
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Tudor Place Historic House & Garden
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Foss Waterway Seaport in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tudor Place Historic House & Garden in 2026.

Incident History — Foss Waterway Seaport (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Foss Waterway Seaport cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Tudor Place Historic House & Garden (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tudor Place Historic House & Garden cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/foss-waterway-seaport.jpeg
Foss Waterway Seaport
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tudor-place-historic-house-and-garden.jpeg
Tudor Place Historic House & Garden
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Foss Waterway Seaport company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Tudor Place Historic House & Garden company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Tudor Place Historic House & Garden company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Foss Waterway Seaport company.

In the current year, Tudor Place Historic House & Garden company and Foss Waterway Seaport company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Tudor Place Historic House & Garden company nor Foss Waterway Seaport company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Tudor Place Historic House & Garden company nor Foss Waterway Seaport company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Tudor Place Historic House & Garden company nor Foss Waterway Seaport company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Foss Waterway Seaport company nor Tudor Place Historic House & Garden company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Foss Waterway Seaport nor Tudor Place Historic House & Garden holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Foss Waterway Seaport company nor Tudor Place Historic House & Garden company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Tudor Place Historic House & Garden company employs more people globally than Foss Waterway Seaport company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Foss Waterway Seaport nor Tudor Place Historic House & Garden holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Foss Waterway Seaport nor Tudor Place Historic House & Garden holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Foss Waterway Seaport nor Tudor Place Historic House & Garden holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Foss Waterway Seaport nor Tudor Place Historic House & Garden holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Foss Waterway Seaport nor Tudor Place Historic House & Garden holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Foss Waterway Seaport nor Tudor Place Historic House & Garden holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References