Comparison Overview

Foss Waterway Seaport

VS

Chrysler Museum of Art

Foss Waterway Seaport

undefined, undefined, undefined, 98421, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01

Foss Waterway Seaport is dedicated to celebrating Tacoma's rich maritime heritage — past, present, and future. The development partners of this project — the Foss Waterway Seaport and the Foss Waterway Development Authority — are creating a venue bringing downtown Tacoma's gathering place to life and providing waterfront public access for the rich teaching platform provided by Commencement Bay and Puget Sound. When fully completed, the Seaport will be the most comprehensive maritime heritage and education center on the US west coast and the only authentic Pacific Northwest facility to showcase the region's maritime history in a location where that history actually took place!

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 26
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Chrysler Museum of Art

One Memorial Place, Norfolk, VA, US, 23510
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1939 as the Norfolk Museum of Arts and Sciences, the Chrysler Museum of Art combines one of America's great fine arts museums, two significant historic houses and a Glass Studio, the only one of its kind on the East Coast. In addition to maintaining a distinguished permanent collection of over 30,000 objects spanning nearly 5,000 years of history, the Chrysler Museum offers a comprehensive program of changing exhibitions and education activities for visitors of all ages.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 159
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/foss-waterway-seaport.jpeg
Foss Waterway Seaport
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chrysler-museum-of-art.jpeg
Chrysler Museum of Art
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Foss Waterway Seaport
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Chrysler Museum of Art
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Foss Waterway Seaport in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chrysler Museum of Art in 2025.

Incident History — Foss Waterway Seaport (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Foss Waterway Seaport cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Chrysler Museum of Art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chrysler Museum of Art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/foss-waterway-seaport.jpeg
Foss Waterway Seaport
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chrysler-museum-of-art.jpeg
Chrysler Museum of Art
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Foss Waterway Seaport company and Chrysler Museum of Art company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Chrysler Museum of Art company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Foss Waterway Seaport company.

In the current year, Chrysler Museum of Art company and Foss Waterway Seaport company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Chrysler Museum of Art company nor Foss Waterway Seaport company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Chrysler Museum of Art company nor Foss Waterway Seaport company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Chrysler Museum of Art company nor Foss Waterway Seaport company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Foss Waterway Seaport company nor Chrysler Museum of Art company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Foss Waterway Seaport nor Chrysler Museum of Art holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Foss Waterway Seaport company nor Chrysler Museum of Art company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Chrysler Museum of Art company employs more people globally than Foss Waterway Seaport company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Foss Waterway Seaport nor Chrysler Museum of Art holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Foss Waterway Seaport nor Chrysler Museum of Art holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Foss Waterway Seaport nor Chrysler Museum of Art holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Foss Waterway Seaport nor Chrysler Museum of Art holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Foss Waterway Seaport nor Chrysler Museum of Art holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Foss Waterway Seaport nor Chrysler Museum of Art holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X