Comparison Overview

TBD

VS

AeC

TBD

15 Bernal Rd San Jose, California 95119, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 800 and 849

TBD

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 5,001-10,000
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

AeC

Rua Espírito Santo, 871 - Bairro Centro, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, BR, 30160-031
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

A AeC é apontada consistentemente como a líder brasileira na entrega de soluções de experiência do cliente e gestão de processos terceirizados. Servindo as principais marcas do mercado nacional, conquistou nos três últimos anos a posição de Empresa do Ano de BPO pela conceituada Frost and Sullivan. Líder também nas práticas de ESG, recebe há oito anos consecutivos o título de Melhor Empresa de Serviços pelo Prêmio Época Negócios 360°. Com um olhar inovador, o seu diferencial está no modo como integra o cuidado com as pessoas e aplica tecnologia de ponta em seus processos, como inteligência artificial, robotic process automation, serviços em nuvem e ferramentas de analytics e segurança. Atualmente, a AeC conta com mais de 52 mil colaboradores em 20 unidades distribuídas por sete estados do país. É certificada pelo instituto Great Place to Work como uma das melhores empresas para se trabalhar. Com uma combinação única de Tecnologia e Calor Humano, a mais de 30 anos de história conquistando, apenas no último ano, 27 importantes prêmios e reconhecimentos do mercado. Venha evoluir conosco! Entre em contato com a gente através do e-mail: [email protected]

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 33,624
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/foshan-haitian-flavouring-and-food-company-ltd-603288-ss.jpeg
TBD
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aec.jpeg
AeC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
TBD
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
AeC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TBD in 2025.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AeC in 2025.

Incident History — TBD (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TBD cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — AeC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AeC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/foshan-haitian-flavouring-and-food-company-ltd-603288-ss.jpeg
TBD
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aec.jpeg
AeC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

TBD company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to AeC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, AeC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to TBD company.

In the current year, AeC company and TBD company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither AeC company nor TBD company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither AeC company nor TBD company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither AeC company nor TBD company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither TBD company nor AeC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither TBD nor AeC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither TBD company nor AeC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither TBD nor AeC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither TBD nor AeC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither TBD nor AeC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither TBD nor AeC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither TBD nor AeC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither TBD nor AeC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H