Comparison Overview

FORVIA

VS

Marcopolo S.A.

FORVIA

None
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

FORVIA comprises the complementary technology and industrial strengths of Faurecia and HELLA. With over 300 industrial sites and 77 R&D centers, 150,000 people, including more than 35,000 engineers across 40+ countries, FORVIA provides a unique and comprehensive approach to the automotive challenges of today and tomorrow. Composed of 6 business groups with 24 product lines, and a strong IP portfolio of over 15,000 patents, FORVIA is focused on becoming the preferred innovation and integration partner for OEMS worldwide. FORVIA aims to be a change maker committed to foreseeing and making the mobility transformation happen.

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 56,528
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Marcopolo S.A.

Av. Rio Branco, 4889 - Ana Rech Caixa Postal 238 Caxias do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul 95060-145, BR
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

A Marcopolo S.A é uma empresa brasileira fundada em 1949 que participa ativamente no desenvolvimento de soluções para a mobilidade nos principais mercados mundiais. Atualmente com 11 unidades fabris no exterior, é composta por empresas dedicadas à fabricação de ônibus, micro-ônibus e peças, soluções financeiras e ferroviárias. Também conta com a Fundação Marcopolo, que desenvolve ações de responsabilidade social voltadas à promoção da qualidade de vida e da cidadania junto aos colaboradores, familiares e comunidades onde as empresas estão presentes. A Next e a MarcoZero que são braços de inovação e investimentos em novos negócios. O processo seletivo da Marcopolo S.A é conduzido por canais de recrutamento oficiais e não envolve qualquer espécie de cobranças. Para mais informações, entre em contato via SAC - [email protected] ou pelo número 0800 707 00 78.

NAICS: 336
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/forvia.jpeg
FORVIA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/marcopolo-sa.jpeg
Marcopolo S.A.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
FORVIA
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Marcopolo S.A.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FORVIA in 2025.

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Marcopolo S.A. in 2025.

Incident History — FORVIA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FORVIA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Marcopolo S.A. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Marcopolo S.A. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/forvia.jpeg
FORVIA
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/marcopolo-sa.jpeg
Marcopolo S.A.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Marcopolo S.A. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to FORVIA company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Marcopolo S.A. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to FORVIA company.

In the current year, Marcopolo S.A. company and FORVIA company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Marcopolo S.A. company nor FORVIA company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Marcopolo S.A. company nor FORVIA company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Marcopolo S.A. company nor FORVIA company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither FORVIA company nor Marcopolo S.A. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither FORVIA nor Marcopolo S.A. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

FORVIA company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Marcopolo S.A. company.

FORVIA company employs more people globally than Marcopolo S.A. company, reflecting its scale as a Motor Vehicle Manufacturing.

Neither FORVIA nor Marcopolo S.A. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither FORVIA nor Marcopolo S.A. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither FORVIA nor Marcopolo S.A. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither FORVIA nor Marcopolo S.A. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither FORVIA nor Marcopolo S.A. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither FORVIA nor Marcopolo S.A. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H