Comparison Overview

Fortson, Bentley & Griffin, P.A.

VS

R Costings Limited

Fortson, Bentley & Griffin, P.A.

2500 Daniell's Bridge Road, Athens, Georgia, 30606, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Fortson, Bentley and Griffin, P.A. is located in Athens, Georgia and provides a broad range of legal services to clients throughout Northeast Georgia. Our attorneys are organized into practice areas which enables each attorney in the firm to develop the depth of knowledge and experience that is critical for the effective representation of our clients. Our practice areas include commercial, personal injury and other civil litigation, as well as criminal and employment litigation, health care, estate planning and administration, tax, real estate, banking and finance, franchising and distribution, and general business and corporate representation. Our firm has been focused on meeting the legal needs of individuals, large and small businesses, financial institutions, hospitals, and local governments throughout Northeast Georgia since 1946.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 39
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

R Costings Limited

St. John's Court, East Street, St Ives, PE27 5PD, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

Based in Cambridgeshire, R Costings Limited is a leading firm of Costs Lawyers, Draftsmen and Consultants providing a comprehensive legal costs service to the legal profession, corporate organisations, trade unions, businesses and associations of all sizes. R Costings Limited has grown rapidly since it was formed in 2002 by its Managing Director Paul Reason, and now employs a number of Costs Lawyers, Law Costs Draftsmen and support staff, servicing the industry nationwide. R Costings Limited regularly attends Detailed Assessments in all parts of England and Wales and has represented clients on all levels from County Court to the House of Lords. As Costs Lawyers, we accept all types of legal services work, from preparing Statements of Costs to Bills in multi-track, complex litigation, including group litigation. For urgent work of any type, we are always willing to arrange an attendance at your offices where work can be carried out; alternatively, we will arrange a free and urgent collection of your file with use of our courier service. R Costings offers in-house training and has formed valuable links with leading Barristers Chambers in London and leading authorities within the legal profession. As members of the Association of Costs Lawyers, you can be assured that the quality of our work and the legal services we provide are of the highest standards with employees being regulated by their professional governing body.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fortson-bentley-&-griffin.jpeg
Fortson, Bentley & Griffin, P.A.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/r-costings-limited.jpeg
R Costings Limited
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Fortson, Bentley & Griffin, P.A.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
R Costings Limited
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fortson, Bentley & Griffin, P.A. in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for R Costings Limited in 2025.

Incident History — Fortson, Bentley & Griffin, P.A. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fortson, Bentley & Griffin, P.A. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — R Costings Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

R Costings Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fortson-bentley-&-griffin.jpeg
Fortson, Bentley & Griffin, P.A.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/r-costings-limited.jpeg
R Costings Limited
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Fortson, Bentley & Griffin, P.A. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to R Costings Limited company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, R Costings Limited company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Fortson, Bentley & Griffin, P.A. company.

In the current year, R Costings Limited company and Fortson, Bentley & Griffin, P.A. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither R Costings Limited company nor Fortson, Bentley & Griffin, P.A. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither R Costings Limited company nor Fortson, Bentley & Griffin, P.A. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither R Costings Limited company nor Fortson, Bentley & Griffin, P.A. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Fortson, Bentley & Griffin, P.A. company nor R Costings Limited company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Fortson, Bentley & Griffin, P.A. nor R Costings Limited holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Fortson, Bentley & Griffin, P.A. company nor R Costings Limited company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Fortson, Bentley & Griffin, P.A. company employs more people globally than R Costings Limited company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Fortson, Bentley & Griffin, P.A. nor R Costings Limited holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Fortson, Bentley & Griffin, P.A. nor R Costings Limited holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Fortson, Bentley & Griffin, P.A. nor R Costings Limited holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Fortson, Bentley & Griffin, P.A. nor R Costings Limited holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Fortson, Bentley & Griffin, P.A. nor R Costings Limited holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Fortson, Bentley & Griffin, P.A. nor R Costings Limited holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X