Comparison Overview

Fortem Australia

VS

Full Circle Recovery Inc.

Fortem Australia

Canberra, 2600, AU
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Fortem Australia is a not-for-profit organisation that supports the mental health and wellbeing of first responders and their families. Every day, more than 370,000 first responders keep our communities safe. They are backed up by their families: partners, children and parents. All of them hold vital, and challenging, roles. We help them to be well, and stay well, supporting them to respond with resilience.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 42
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Full Circle Recovery Inc.

1860 Lampton Ln., Norco, CA, 92860, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Full Circle Recovery is a CARF Accredited Christian-Based Addiction Recovery Center that utilizes multiple methods of therapy and counseling techniques. Our program targets Whole Person Counseling and underlying addiction concerns. Program components include Theological Studies, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Psychological Education, Bio-Physical Education, One-on-One Counseling, Drug Education, Relapse Prevention, On-Site Work-as-Therapy, Discipleship, and Group Meetings as well as Equestrian Therapy. Full Circle Recovery is one of the only pastor-led, church-based professional substance abuse and mental health treatment care facilities in the state of California. Our staff members have been professionally trained in the counseling industry- from PhD to MFT's to Master Life Coaches and Certified Drug and Alcohol Counselors. Our professionally staffed facility brings multi- level treatment team care to all of our patients. We offer detoxification, intensive residential in-patient, out-patient treatment, and medication management where needed. Full Circle Recovery is approved by the American Association of Christian Counselors (AACC), the National Association of Alcoholism and Drug Abuse Counselors (NAADAC). There are a myriad of other establishments relying on our trusted insights and understanding of getting good recovery and positive mental health outcomes.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fortemaustralia.jpeg
Fortem Australia
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/full-circle-recovery-inc-.jpeg
Full Circle Recovery Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Fortem Australia
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Full Circle Recovery Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fortem Australia in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Full Circle Recovery Inc. in 2026.

Incident History — Fortem Australia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fortem Australia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Full Circle Recovery Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Full Circle Recovery Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fortemaustralia.jpeg
Fortem Australia
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/full-circle-recovery-inc-.jpeg
Full Circle Recovery Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Full Circle Recovery Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Fortem Australia company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Full Circle Recovery Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Fortem Australia company.

In the current year, Full Circle Recovery Inc. company and Fortem Australia company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Full Circle Recovery Inc. company nor Fortem Australia company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Full Circle Recovery Inc. company nor Fortem Australia company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Full Circle Recovery Inc. company nor Fortem Australia company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Fortem Australia company nor Full Circle Recovery Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Fortem Australia nor Full Circle Recovery Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Fortem Australia company nor Full Circle Recovery Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Fortem Australia company employs more people globally than Full Circle Recovery Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Fortem Australia nor Full Circle Recovery Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Fortem Australia nor Full Circle Recovery Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Fortem Australia nor Full Circle Recovery Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Fortem Australia nor Full Circle Recovery Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Fortem Australia nor Full Circle Recovery Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Fortem Australia nor Full Circle Recovery Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N