Comparison Overview

Fort Worth Aviation Museum

VS

Denver Botanic Gardens

Fort Worth Aviation Museum

3300 Ross Ave, Fort Worth, Texas, 76106, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02

North Texas history is rich with incredible stories and aviation triumphs, and at the Fort Worth Aviation Museum we celebrate and share this history with the public. Visit our museum where we display our heritage, educate citizens, and inspire the youth to achieve their full potentials. We have over 25 airplanes, interactive exhibits, and a flight simulator.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Denver Botanic Gardens

1007 York St., Denver, 80206, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02

Green inside and out, Denver Botanic Gardens is considered one of the top botanical gardens in the United States and a pioneer in water conservation. Accredited by the American Association of Museums, the Gardens’ living collections encompass specimens from the tropics to the tundra, showcasing a plant palette chosen to thrive in Colorado’s semi-arid climate. The Gardens'​ dynamic, 24-acre urban oasis in the heart of the city, offers unforgettable opportunities to flourish with unique garden experiences for the whole family – as well as world-class education and plant conservation research programs. Additional sites at Chatfield Farms, a 700-acre wildlife and native plant refuge in Jefferson County; and Mount Goliath, a high-altitude trail and interpretive site on the Mount Evans Scenic Byway, extend this experience throughout the Front Range.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 323
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fort-worth-aviation-museum.jpeg
Fort Worth Aviation Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/denver-botanic-gardens.jpeg
Denver Botanic Gardens
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Fort Worth Aviation Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Denver Botanic Gardens
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fort Worth Aviation Museum in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Denver Botanic Gardens in 2025.

Incident History — Fort Worth Aviation Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fort Worth Aviation Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Denver Botanic Gardens (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Denver Botanic Gardens cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fort-worth-aviation-museum.jpeg
Fort Worth Aviation Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/denver-botanic-gardens.jpeg
Denver Botanic Gardens
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Denver Botanic Gardens company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Fort Worth Aviation Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Denver Botanic Gardens company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Fort Worth Aviation Museum company.

In the current year, Denver Botanic Gardens company and Fort Worth Aviation Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Denver Botanic Gardens company nor Fort Worth Aviation Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Denver Botanic Gardens company nor Fort Worth Aviation Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Denver Botanic Gardens company nor Fort Worth Aviation Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Fort Worth Aviation Museum company nor Denver Botanic Gardens company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Fort Worth Aviation Museum nor Denver Botanic Gardens holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Fort Worth Aviation Museum company nor Denver Botanic Gardens company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Denver Botanic Gardens company employs more people globally than Fort Worth Aviation Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Fort Worth Aviation Museum nor Denver Botanic Gardens holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Fort Worth Aviation Museum nor Denver Botanic Gardens holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Fort Worth Aviation Museum nor Denver Botanic Gardens holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Fort Worth Aviation Museum nor Denver Botanic Gardens holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Fort Worth Aviation Museum nor Denver Botanic Gardens holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Fort Worth Aviation Museum nor Denver Botanic Gardens holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X