Comparison Overview

Fort Walla Walla Museum

VS

Hunter Museum of American Art

Fort Walla Walla Museum

755 SE Myra Rd, Walla Walla, Washington, 99362, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://fwwm.org

Walla Walla has long been known as the “Cradle of Pacific Northwest History.” By creating connections with this history, Fort Walla Walla Museum provides a sense of belonging to both long-term local residents and families that move to the area. At Fort Walla Walla Museum more than 50,000 artifacts and photographs as well as a Living History series and other events and programs tell the story of the many people who have inhabited the Walla Walla Valley. The Museum strives to continue to learn about the region’s heritage, to share this heritage through exhibits, events, publications, and other programs, and to keep it safe for future generations.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Hunter Museum of American Art

10 Bluff View, Chattanooga, TN, 37415, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
http://www.huntermuseum.org

The Hunter Museum focuses on American art from the Colonial period to the present day. The variety of the collection inside is reflected by the architecture of the museum's exterior. The museum is housed in an early twentieth century mansion, a modern 1970s era building and a sleek, contemporary structure of steel and glass. The museum's collection includes paintings, works on paper, sculpture, furniture and contemporary studio glass covering a diverse range of styles and periods. The Hunter Museum is a 501 (C) 3 Non-Profit charitable institution.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 49
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fort-wallawalla-museum.jpeg
Fort Walla Walla Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hunter-museum-of-american-art.jpeg
Hunter Museum of American Art
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Fort Walla Walla Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Hunter Museum of American Art
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fort Walla Walla Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hunter Museum of American Art in 2026.

Incident History — Fort Walla Walla Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fort Walla Walla Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Hunter Museum of American Art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hunter Museum of American Art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fort-wallawalla-museum.jpeg
Fort Walla Walla Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hunter-museum-of-american-art.jpeg
Hunter Museum of American Art
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Fort Walla Walla Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Hunter Museum of American Art company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Hunter Museum of American Art company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Fort Walla Walla Museum company.

In the current year, Hunter Museum of American Art company and Fort Walla Walla Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Hunter Museum of American Art company nor Fort Walla Walla Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Hunter Museum of American Art company nor Fort Walla Walla Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Hunter Museum of American Art company nor Fort Walla Walla Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Fort Walla Walla Museum company nor Hunter Museum of American Art company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Fort Walla Walla Museum nor Hunter Museum of American Art holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Fort Walla Walla Museum company nor Hunter Museum of American Art company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Hunter Museum of American Art company employs more people globally than Fort Walla Walla Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Fort Walla Walla Museum nor Hunter Museum of American Art holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Fort Walla Walla Museum nor Hunter Museum of American Art holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Fort Walla Walla Museum nor Hunter Museum of American Art holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Fort Walla Walla Museum nor Hunter Museum of American Art holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Fort Walla Walla Museum nor Hunter Museum of American Art holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Fort Walla Walla Museum nor Hunter Museum of American Art holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References