Comparison Overview

Fort Ticonderoga

VS

Four Mile Historic Park

Fort Ticonderoga

100 Fort Ti Road., Ticonderoga, NY, US, 12883
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.fortticonderoga.org

Fort Ticonderoga is an independent nonprofit educational organization, museum, and cultural destination. Welcoming visitors since 1909, it preserves North America’s largest 18th-century artillery collection, 2000 acres of historic landscape on Lake Champlain, and Carillon Battlefield, and the largest series of Revolutionary 18th-century earthworks surviving in America. Fort Ticonderoga engages more than 75,000 visitors each year and offers programs, historic interpretation, boat cruises, tours, demonstrations, and exhibits throughout the year and is open for daily visitation May through October. Fort Ticonderoga is accredited by the American Alliance of Museums and pursues its vision to be the premier cultural destination in North America. Visit www.FortTiconderoga.org for a full list of ongoing programs or call 518-585-2821. Fort Ticonderoga is located at 102 Fort Ti Road, Ticonderoga, New York. Fort Ticonderoga 102 Fort Ti Road. Ticonderoga, NY 12883 (518) 585-2821 www.fortticonderoga.org

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 35
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Four Mile Historic Park

715 S. FOREST ST, DENVER, Colorado, 80246, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.FourMilePark.org

On the banks of Cherry Creek, just four miles from downtown Denver, Four Mile Historic Park is a 12-acre oasis featuring Denver's oldest standing structure, pioneer exhibits, special events for all ages, and guided tours that transport visitors to Colorado's frontier past. Once a wayside inn and stage stop, Four Mile House and grounds are the setting for unique family, student, senior and rental activities that offer visitors a unique experience apart from the bustle of their busy lives.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fort-ticonderoga.jpeg
Fort Ticonderoga
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/four-mile-historic-park.jpeg
Four Mile Historic Park
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Fort Ticonderoga
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Four Mile Historic Park
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fort Ticonderoga in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Four Mile Historic Park in 2026.

Incident History — Fort Ticonderoga (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fort Ticonderoga cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Four Mile Historic Park (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Four Mile Historic Park cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fort-ticonderoga.jpeg
Fort Ticonderoga
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/four-mile-historic-park.jpeg
Four Mile Historic Park
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Fort Ticonderoga company and Four Mile Historic Park company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Four Mile Historic Park company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Fort Ticonderoga company.

In the current year, Four Mile Historic Park company and Fort Ticonderoga company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Four Mile Historic Park company nor Fort Ticonderoga company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Four Mile Historic Park company nor Fort Ticonderoga company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Four Mile Historic Park company nor Fort Ticonderoga company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Fort Ticonderoga company nor Four Mile Historic Park company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Fort Ticonderoga nor Four Mile Historic Park holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Fort Ticonderoga company nor Four Mile Historic Park company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Fort Ticonderoga company employs more people globally than Four Mile Historic Park company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Fort Ticonderoga nor Four Mile Historic Park holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Fort Ticonderoga nor Four Mile Historic Park holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Fort Ticonderoga nor Four Mile Historic Park holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Fort Ticonderoga nor Four Mile Historic Park holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Fort Ticonderoga nor Four Mile Historic Park holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Fort Ticonderoga nor Four Mile Historic Park holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References