Comparison Overview

Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture

VS

Wichita Art Museum

Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture

2 Marina Blvd, Building A, San Francisco, 94123, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture is a waterfront destination for thought-provoking programs, events, restaurants, and nonprofit organizations that support and reflect the evolving cultural fabric of San Francisco and the Bay Area. An arts hub within San Francisco, the campus consists of former military-use buildings, piers, and open space within the Golden Gate National Recreation Area.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 46
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Wichita Art Museum

1400 West Museum Boulevard, Wichita, 67203, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

The Wichita Art Museum is located west of downtown Wichita in the heart of the Museums on the River district. WAM offers: • Free general admission to the museum's permanent collection galleries • A commitment to positively impact the lives of Wichitans and the city’s cultural landscape through compelling experiences with the visual arts • One of the prized collections of American art in the country, now more than 10,000 artworks strong • Changing exhibitions that bring art-world trends to Wichita and present strong local artists • Weekly highly-valued family and children’s educational programs • Free bus reimbursement for school field trips • Lifelong-learning programs and special events including free lectures, concerts, films, Senior Wednesday, Art Chatter, and Exhibition Closing Parties • Open 10 am to 5 pm Wednesday through Sunday; open late Friday nights until 9 pm; closed Monday, Tuesday and major holidays

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 38
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fort-mason-center-for-arts-&-culture.jpeg
Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wichita-art-museum.jpeg
Wichita Art Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Wichita Art Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wichita Art Museum in 2025.

Incident History — Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Wichita Art Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wichita Art Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fort-mason-center-for-arts-&-culture.jpeg
Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wichita-art-museum.jpeg
Wichita Art Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture company and Wichita Art Museum company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Wichita Art Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture company.

In the current year, Wichita Art Museum company and Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Wichita Art Museum company nor Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Wichita Art Museum company nor Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Wichita Art Museum company nor Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture company nor Wichita Art Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture nor Wichita Art Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture company nor Wichita Art Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture company employs more people globally than Wichita Art Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture nor Wichita Art Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture nor Wichita Art Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture nor Wichita Art Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture nor Wichita Art Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture nor Wichita Art Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture nor Wichita Art Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X