Comparison Overview

Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture

VS

Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania

Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture

2 Marina Blvd, Building A, San Francisco, 94123, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture is a waterfront destination for thought-provoking programs, events, restaurants, and nonprofit organizations that support and reflect the evolving cultural fabric of San Francisco and the Bay Area. An arts hub within San Francisco, the campus consists of former military-use buildings, piers, and open space within the Golden Gate National Recreation Area.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 46
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania

100 E. Northwestern Ave, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19118, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03

The Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania is a historic public garden and educational institution. It promotes an understanding of the relationship between plants, people and place through programs that integrate science, art and the humanities. The Arboretum conducts four major activities: education, research, outreach, and horticultural display. As the official Arboretum of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, the Morris Arboretum of the University of Pennsylvania provides research and outreach services to state agencies, community institutions and to citizens of Pennsylvania and beyond.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 79
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fort-mason-center-for-arts-&-culture.jpeg
Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/morris-arboretum-of-the-univ.jpeg
Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania in 2025.

Incident History — Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fort-mason-center-for-arts-&-culture.jpeg
Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/morris-arboretum-of-the-univ.jpeg
Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture company.

In the current year, Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania company and Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania company nor Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania company nor Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania company nor Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture company nor Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture nor Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture company.

Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania company employs more people globally than Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture nor Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture nor Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture nor Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture nor Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture nor Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture nor Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X