Comparison Overview

Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture

VS

Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art

Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture

2 Marina Blvd, Building A, San Francisco, 94123, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.fortmason.org

Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture is a waterfront destination for thought-provoking programs, events, restaurants, and nonprofit organizations that support and reflect the evolving cultural fabric of San Francisco and the Bay Area. An arts hub within San Francisco, the campus consists of former military-use buildings, piers, and open space within the Golden Gate National Recreation Area.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 46
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art

Gateshead Quays, South Shore Road, Gateshead, GB, NE8 3BA
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://baltic.art

BALTIC is a major international centre for contemporary art, housed in a landmark industrial building on the south bank of the River Tyne in Gateshead, BALTIC does not have a permanent collection, providing instead an ever-changing calendar of exhibitions and events that give a unique and compelling insight into contemporary artistic practice. BALTIC’s dynamic, diverse and international programme ranges from blockbuster exhibitions to innovative new work and projects created by artists working within the local community. BALTIC is a place where visitors can experience innovative and provocative new art, relax, have fun, learn and discover fresh ideas. BALTIC is an international leader in the ambitious and distinctive presentation, commissioning, development and communication of contemporary visual art. BALTIC is a registered charity, support by the Arts Council, grants from trusts and foundations, corporate sponsorship and trading activities in the restaurant,cafe and the BALTIC Shop. http://shop.balticmil.com

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 91
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fort-mason-center-for-arts-&-culture.jpeg
Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/baltic-centre-for-contemporary-art.jpeg
Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art in 2026.

Incident History — Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fort-mason-center-for-arts-&-culture.jpeg
Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/baltic-centre-for-contemporary-art.jpeg
Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture company.

In the current year, Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art company and Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art company nor Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art company nor Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art company nor Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture company nor Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture nor Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture company nor Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art company employs more people globally than Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture nor Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture nor Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture nor Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture nor Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture nor Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture nor Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References