Comparison Overview

Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture

VS

Afactory Studio Museum of Arts

Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture

2 Marina Blvd, Building A, San Francisco, 94123, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture is a waterfront destination for thought-provoking programs, events, restaurants, and nonprofit organizations that support and reflect the evolving cultural fabric of San Francisco and the Bay Area. An arts hub within San Francisco, the campus consists of former military-use buildings, piers, and open space within the Golden Gate National Recreation Area.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 46
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Afactory Studio Museum of Arts

3301 Conflans Rd, Irving, Texas, 75061, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Yelp Social Icon Facebook Social Icon YouTube Social Icon Instagram Social Icon Here at AFactory Studio, our sole purpose is to empower artists and non-artist in our thriving Art Center in Irving, Texas. We’ve got a history of commitment toward our students and our artists. While we’re dedicated to producing our own art and community art, we’re also devoted to bringing the artist out in our students. Offering workshops to adults and students in various age range, there’s something for anyone looking to foster their inner Picasso. We strive to instill creativity and teach form and function to all artists and guests that come to AFactory Studio seeking a fun, relaxing, and well rounded artistic experience. Afactory Studio has shared office/studio spaces intended as a hub for work, network, and culture and is one-of-a-kind studio that provides shared studio space, workspace, conference, events and art exhibition for all location to meet, shoot and sell creative work to the needs of the growing industry by providing spaces, jobs, connection, culture, and clients. An artist with a purpose, work, and education if given a chance to better themselves and be awarded for their work will better their friends, their family, and their community. Art heals it all. We want to build and help built every community to this purpose. Our veterans get free access to selected events, workshops, Community building projects.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fort-mason-center-for-arts-&-culture.jpeg
Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/afactorystudio.jpeg
Afactory Studio Museum of Arts
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Afactory Studio Museum of Arts
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Afactory Studio Museum of Arts in 2026.

Incident History — Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Afactory Studio Museum of Arts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Afactory Studio Museum of Arts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fort-mason-center-for-arts-&-culture.jpeg
Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/afactorystudio.jpeg
Afactory Studio Museum of Arts
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Afactory Studio Museum of Arts company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Afactory Studio Museum of Arts company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture company.

In the current year, Afactory Studio Museum of Arts company and Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Afactory Studio Museum of Arts company nor Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Afactory Studio Museum of Arts company nor Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Afactory Studio Museum of Arts company nor Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture company nor Afactory Studio Museum of Arts company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture nor Afactory Studio Museum of Arts holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture company nor Afactory Studio Museum of Arts company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture company employs more people globally than Afactory Studio Museum of Arts company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture nor Afactory Studio Museum of Arts holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture nor Afactory Studio Museum of Arts holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture nor Afactory Studio Museum of Arts holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture nor Afactory Studio Museum of Arts holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture nor Afactory Studio Museum of Arts holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Fort Mason Center for Arts & Culture nor Afactory Studio Museum of Arts holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N