Comparison Overview

Ford Motor Company

VS

Marelli

Ford Motor Company

None, None, Dearborn, Michigan, US, None
Last Update: 2025-12-09

We don't just make history -- we make the future. Ford put the world on wheels over a century ago, and our teams are re-inventing icons and creating groundbreaking connected and electric vehicles for the next century. We believe in serving our customers, our communities, and the world. If you do, too, come move the world and make the future with us. Ford is a global company with shared ideals and a deep sense of family. From our earliest days as a pioneer of modern transportation, we have sought to make the world a better place – one that benefits lives, communities and the planet. We are here to provide the means for every person to move and pursue their dreams, serving as a bridge between personal freedom and the future of mobility. In that pursuit, our 186,000 employees around the world help to set the pace of innovation every day. Privacy Policy: https://www.ford.com/help/privacy/

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 143,957
Subsidiaries: 35
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Marelli

2 Chome-1917 Nisshincho, Kita Ward, Saitama City, Saitama, Tokyo, 331-0823, JP
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

Marelli is a global, independent technology partner to the automotive industry, with a strong and established track record in innovation and manufacturing excellence. As mobility is evolving fast and global trends drive unprecedented innovation, we leverage our expertise in integrating software and hardware to position ourselves as key enablers of the Software Defined Vehicle. Our Netiquette: Welcome to the Marelli LinkedIn page! On this LinkedIn Page, Marelli will share the most important news about its technological innovations, Corporate and Motorsport activities, using different kinds of media contents. Each user can participate and share his point of view. The comments are monitored and moderated following specific guidelines that we want to share with you, in order to establish an open and clear relationship with our fanbase. The administrators will participate in the conversations of the community – when the number of interactions allows them to do it – and they’ll respond to the questions of the users, only if these questions are not direct competence of the Marelli Customer Service. We reserve the right to remove comments that: - are not pertinent to the posts of the page; - consist in a violation of user’s privacy (ex. to share a user’s telephone number); - have vulgar, offensive or sexual content; - have the purpose to intimidate or discredit other people, institutions and religions; - violate any user’s rights; - promote illegal activities; - promote products, events or commercial services, even if they’re not direct competitors of Marelli; - have a political, ideological or religious content. In case of disagree among users or between users and administrators of the page, we invite all the members of the community to debate and contribute with respect for all the opinions, following the aim of the page itself. Every user assumes the full responsibility for all the content that he shares on the Marelli LinkedIn page.

NAICS: 336
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 17,465
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ford-motor-company.jpeg
Ford Motor Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/marelligroup.jpeg
Marelli
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ford Motor Company
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Marelli
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ford Motor Company in 2025.

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Marelli in 2025.

Incident History — Ford Motor Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ford Motor Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Marelli (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Marelli cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ford-motor-company.jpeg
Ford Motor Company
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2020
Type:Vulnerability
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/marelligroup.jpeg
Marelli
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Ford Motor Company company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Marelli company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Ford Motor Company company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Marelli company has not reported any.

In the current year, Marelli company and Ford Motor Company company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Marelli company nor Ford Motor Company company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Marelli company nor Ford Motor Company company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Marelli company nor Ford Motor Company company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Ford Motor Company company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Marelli company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Ford Motor Company nor Marelli holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Ford Motor Company company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Marelli company.

Ford Motor Company company employs more people globally than Marelli company, reflecting its scale as a Motor Vehicle Manufacturing.

Neither Ford Motor Company nor Marelli holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ford Motor Company nor Marelli holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ford Motor Company nor Marelli holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ford Motor Company nor Marelli holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ford Motor Company nor Marelli holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ford Motor Company nor Marelli holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N