Comparison Overview

Ford Motor Company

VS

Adient

Ford Motor Company

None, None, Dearborn, Michigan, US, None
Last Update: 2025-12-09

We don't just make history -- we make the future. Ford put the world on wheels over a century ago, and our teams are re-inventing icons and creating groundbreaking connected and electric vehicles for the next century. We believe in serving our customers, our communities, and the world. If you do, too, come move the world and make the future with us. Ford is a global company with shared ideals and a deep sense of family. From our earliest days as a pioneer of modern transportation, we have sought to make the world a better place – one that benefits lives, communities and the planet. We are here to provide the means for every person to move and pursue their dreams, serving as a bridge between personal freedom and the future of mobility. In that pursuit, our 186,000 employees around the world help to set the pace of innovation every day. Privacy Policy: https://www.ford.com/help/privacy/

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 143,957
Subsidiaries: 35
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Adient

49200 Halyard Dr, Plymouth, Michigan, 48170, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Adient (NYSE: ADNT) is a global leader in automotive seating. With 70,000+ employees in 29 countries, Adient operates more than 200 manufacturing/assembly plants worldwide. We produce and deliver automotive seating for all major OEMs. From complete seating systems to individual foam, trim and metal components, our expertise spans every step of the automotive seat-making process. Our integrated, in-house skills allow us to take our products from research and design to engineering and manufacturing — and into millions of vehicles every year. For more information, visit www.adient.com.

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 15,747
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ford-motor-company.jpeg
Ford Motor Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/adient.jpeg
Adient
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ford Motor Company
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Adient
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ford Motor Company in 2025.

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Adient in 2025.

Incident History — Ford Motor Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ford Motor Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Adient (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Adient cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ford-motor-company.jpeg
Ford Motor Company
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2020
Type:Vulnerability
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/adient.jpeg
Adient
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Ford Motor Company company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Adient company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Ford Motor Company company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Adient company has not reported any.

In the current year, Adient company and Ford Motor Company company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Adient company nor Ford Motor Company company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Adient company nor Ford Motor Company company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Adient company nor Ford Motor Company company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Ford Motor Company company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Adient company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Ford Motor Company nor Adient holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Ford Motor Company company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Adient company.

Ford Motor Company company employs more people globally than Adient company, reflecting its scale as a Motor Vehicle Manufacturing.

Neither Ford Motor Company nor Adient holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ford Motor Company nor Adient holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ford Motor Company nor Adient holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ford Motor Company nor Adient holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ford Motor Company nor Adient holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ford Motor Company nor Adient holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N